Pope takes a position on Kim Davis controversy: The envelope, please

Pope takes a position on Kim Davis controversy: The envelope, please
Credit: Reuters

For those who didn’t get enough of Pope Francis during his five-day whirlwind U.S. tour, the Pontiff held a press conference aboard his charter flight back to Rome this morning, the transcript of which was recorded for posterity by Vatican Radio. While liberals continue to claim a victory in the pope’s pronouncements on climate change, they have remained conveniently silent on his views on another flash point, same-sex marriage.

On Saturday, in Philadelphia, the pope offered a full-throated defense of religious liberty, which both sides of the ideological spectrum could claim as a win (albeit hypocritically on the part of the left, which seems to support only the free practice of Islam). But in his remarks this morning, the Holy Father was asked about another very specific aspect of religious liberty and one at the center of a bitter and emotionally charged debate: his views on same-sex marriage and of the right of government employees (think Kim Davis) to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Here is the exchange between the pope and Terry Moran of ABC News:

Moran: Holy Father, thank you, thank you very much and thank you to the Vatican staff as well. Holy Father, you visited the Little Sisters of the Poor and we were told that you wanted to show your support for them and their case in the courts. And, Holy Father, do you also support those individuals, including government officials, who say they cannot in good conscience, their own personal conscience, abide by some laws or discharge their duties as government officials, for example in issuing marriage licenses to same sex couples. Do you support those kinds of claims of religious liberty?

Pope: I can’t have in mind all cases that can exist about conscience objection. But, yes, I can say the conscientious objection is a right that is a part of every human right. It is a right. And if a person does not allow others to be a conscientious objector, he denies a right. Conscientious objection must enter into every juridical structure because it is a right, a human right. Otherwise we would end up in a situation where we select what is a right, saying ‘this right that has merit, this one does not.’ It (conscientious objection) is a human right. It always moved me when I read, and I read it many times, when I read the “Chanson de Roland” when the people were all in line and before them was the baptismal font and they had to choose between the baptismal font or the sword. They had to choose. They weren’t permitted conscientious objection. It is a right and if we want to make peace we have to respect all rights.

Moran: Would that include government officials as well?

Pope:  It is a human right and if a government official is a human person, he has that right. It is a human right.

Ben Bowles

Ben Bowles

Ben Bowles is a freelance writer.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.