Why does Obama want to lift an arms ban on a tyrant who won’t even meet with him?

Why does Obama want to lift an arms ban on a tyrant who won’t even meet with him?

Reports emerged Monday that the White House is trying to overturn a 4-year-old arms sale ban to Bahrain — a ban linked to promised advances in human rights that have failed to materialize.

Bahrain’s King Hamad was most recently in the news as a no-show at the White House-organized Camp David summit of Gulf leaders. Instead, his heinous was spotted at the Windsor Horse Show in the company of the U.K.’s Queen Elizabeth.

The U.S. has banned the sale of weapons to Bahrain ever since 2011, when American-made weapons were used to brutally suppress peaceful protests against the government. Any future weapon sales to Bahrain, based on the administration’s own standards, would require specific improvements in Bahrain’s treatment of its citizens.

The State Department’s own human rights report states that Bahrain is guilty of dozens of violations, including “citizens’ inability to change their government peacefully,” arbitrarily detaining and killing peaceful protestors, “violations of privacy” and “restrictions on civil liberties.”

And besides abusing its own citizens, last year Bahrain expelled Tom Malinowski, the State Department’s top official on human rights, for scheduling meetings with members of Bahrain’s opposition political party.

Like its Gulf neighbors at last month’s White House summit, Bahrain is concerned about the consequences of U.S. nuclear negotiations with Iran. So according to Bloomberg News, Secretary of State John Kerry decided to single-handedly change U.S. policy in a Paris meeting with Bahraini officials last month.

Bloomberg now reports that “secret negotiations” are underway between the U.S. and Bahrain to lift the ban, and “U.S. negotiators are now operating with the understanding that lifting the weapons ban is a commitment that Kerry made.”

Bahrain is also home to the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet. In recent years, the American and Bahraini governments have both made threats to cancel that strategic partnership.

May’s promise to Bahrain is not the first time Kerry has altered American policy on the fly. In September 2013, strategy against President Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria changed several times based on apparently impromptu remarks by Kerry.

Threatening that the U.S. would conduct airstrikes against the Syrian regime unless it disposed of its chemical weapons, Kerry said that any attack would nevertheless be an “unbelievably small, limited kind of effort.” President Barack Obama later had to clarify that “the U.S. does not do pinpricks” against its enemies.

In the same 2013 press conference, Kerry suggested that Syria could avoid a U.S. strike by turning over all its chemical weapons in a week. The seemingly rhetorical proposal that met unexpected backing from Russia, a key Syrian ally.

Nearly two years later, and 4 years after the start of Syria’s civil war, U.S. airstrikes have not focused on Syrian government targets.

This report, by Ivan Plis, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

 

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.