Big Labor opposes bill that would allow employers to reward hard work without unions’ blessing

Big Labor opposes bill that would allow employers to reward hard work without unions’ blessing
Barack Obama and his BFF, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka

Advocates for right-to-work policies are pushing a bill for reform of labor laws so that employers can reward employees without having to ask a union’s permission.

The Rewarding Achievement and Incentivizing Successful Employees Act, which was introduced last Thursday by Sen. Marco Rubio and Rep. Todd Rokita, is designed to amend the National Labor Relations Act so employers can give merit-based compensation increases to individual employees, even if those increases are not part of their collective bargaining agreement.

Said Patrick Semmens, the vice president of the National Right to Work Foundation:

Currently, if an employer wants to reward particularly hard-working employees, in almost all cases, the union can and will block any bonuses to those workers, which then makes it difficult to keep the best employees. The bill would stop unions from being able to block such merit bonuses.

Senate labor committee Chairman Lamar Alexander, who is cosponsoring the legislation, said in a statement:

This bill will give employers the freedom to pay their employees more for a job well done, for their dedication and hard work, rather than for their time spent in a union.

Current law, which requires unionized companies to negotiate wage increases through the union, may actually bring down average wages for unionized companies. A study conducted by Brigham Young University shows average wages fall for unionized companies because skilled and experience workers tend to leave for non-unionized companies. As noted in the report:

Estimates exploiting the panel nature of the data to account for pre-election selection are quite different from previous results. They suggest that union representation led to a decrease in establishment payroll, employment, and average worker earnings. The decrease in payroll and earnings was primarily driven by changes in workforce composition in response to a union victory. Higher-paid workers were more likely to leave after a union victory, and younger, lower-paid workers were relatively more likely to come.

The Heritage Foundation argues that this structure discourages hard-working employees, because all too often they are not rewarded for going above and beyond compared to their colleagues:

When you’re in a union, raises are usually all or nothing. They are not necessarily forbidden; the unions just have to sign off on them.

Only about 20 percent of union contracts permit performance-based raises, less than half the rate in nonunion firms. This means 80 percent of workers can’t get an individual raise for doing good work—a raise must be negotiated for everyone. That certainly takes away the incentive to go above and beyond, because there are no performance-based bonuses or even merit increases.

The bill is likely to face a prominent opposition. The Raise Act was originally introduced in 2012 but was quickly defeated by 45-54 vote. At the time, Democrats had a majority in the Senate. As the Service Employees International Union argued at the time, the Raise Act was “aimed to do one thing only – strip unionized workers of their fundamental right to bargain collectively over wages.”

Semmens and the act’s supporters saw this argument coming, though, and they aren’t convinced.

“The fact that ‘Big Labor’ opposes this legislative fix shows that union bosses are interested in maintaining their iron-fisted control over workers at all costs, even if it means less money in the pockets of workers they claim to represent,” Semmens concluded.

This report, by Connor D. Wolf, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.