Nancy Pelosi: Jonathan Gruber ‘didn’t help write our bill; I don’t know who he is’ (Video)

Nancy Pelosi: Jonathan Gruber ‘didn’t help write our bill; I don’t know who he is’ (Video)

There is no way the White House or top Democrats can explain away Jonathan Gruber’s damning claim that a “lack of transparency” was baked into the Affordable Care Act, which passed, moreover, thanks to “the stupidity of the American voter.” But it is fun watching them try.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi came up with a novel twist on the dog-ate-my-homework excuse. Namely, she denied ever having heard of Gruber.

The scene was a press conference earlier today. Pelosi was asked to comment on the MIT economist’s joint revelations that “lack of transparency is a huge political advantage” and “the ‘stupidity of the American voter’ or whatever … was really, really critical to getting the thing to pass.”

From The Hill (via Patrick Dollard):

I don’t know who he is. He didn’t help write our bill. So with all due respect to your question, you have a person who wasn’t writing our bill commenting on what was going on when we were writing the bill who has withdrawn some of the statements he made. So let’s put him aside.

It might be easier to swallow her claim that she doesn’t know who Gruber is “put him aside” if it weren’t for the fact of her having mentioned him by name multiple times on her website in December 2009:

An analysis of the House bill by noted MIT health care economist Jonathan Gruber concludes that the bill would result in lower premiums than under current law for the millions of Americans using the newly-established Health Insurance Exchange…. As Gruber states: “the premiums that individuals will face in the new exchanges established by this legislation are … considerably lower than what they would face in the non-group insurance market [under current law]

  • The Gruber analysis shows that, on the Exchange, a family at 425 percent of poverty(whose income of $93,710 means that they would receive no affordability credits) would see their premiums reduced by $1,260 or 12 percent compared to current law. Similarly, the Gruber analysis shows that, on the Exchange, an individual at 425 percent of poverty (whose income of $46,030 means that they would receive no affordability credits) would see their premiums reduced by $470 or 12 percent.

There’s also this from the New York Times of March 28, 2012:

After Mr. Gruber helped the administration put together the basic principles of the proposal, the White House lent him to Capitol Hill to help Congressional staff members draft the specifics of the legislation.

Maybe Pelosi was home sick during the time of his visit. Or maybe her dog ate her homework.

Related Articles

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.