More Dems who ‘believe,’ plus latest demands by Kavanaugh accuser

More Dems who ‘believe,’ plus latest demands by Kavanaugh accuser
Among Dems who believe Christine Ford are Richard Blumenthal and Maizie Hirono (Image: YouTube screen grab)

As Howard Portnoy noted here earlier today, Christine Blasey Ford has yet to offer evidence in support of her claim that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982, but Democrats have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh. Many acknowledge that Ford hasn’t yet testified, which could conceivably provide a foundation for believing her over Kavanaugh, who has denied the allegations, but that hasn’t prevented them from making up their minds about who’s telling the truth and who’s not.

Some Democratic lawmakers have made statements expressing blind faith in Ford’s assertions. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.) said in essence, “I believe her because I believe her,” a view echoed by Sens. Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) and Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), who said respectively, “I believe Dr. Ford … because she makes a very credible case” and “Let me just say right at the outset I believe Dr Ford. I believe the survivor here, there’s every reason to believe her.”

Others attempted to evince at least the appearance of fair-mindedness. Here’s Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.): “Listen, it comes down to credibility to your point. It’s going to be about listening to what each party has to say, but I believe her.” And here’s Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.): “Well I can tell you it really does have a ring of truth to it.”

In the meantime, Ford has issued some new demands. She now insists that Kavanaugh testify first. In addition, she does not want him in the room when she testifies. So much for the Sixth Amendment, which provides that a person accused of a crime has the right to confront a witness against him.

Trending: Florida vote 2018: Criminal investigations may be tip of the iceberg

Ford’s attorney has also re-raised the prospect of issuing a subpoena to alleged Kavanaugh accomplice Mark Judge, who has already stated that he has no memory of the incident and has no desire to testify. On Tuesday, Judge said through his attorney:

I did not ask to be involved in this matter nor did anyone asked me to be involved. The only reason I am involved is that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault.

How they intend to coax an admission out of him if he is forced to appear remains to be seen.

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using either the Spot.IM commenting system or the Facebook commenting system. If Spot.IM is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.