Obama administration funded Afghan Army units it knew were committing human rights abuses

Obama administration funded Afghan Army units it knew were committing human rights abuses

According to a major report released Tuesday, the Obama administration funded Afghan Army units that it knew were committing human rights abuses.

The report, issued by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) after urging from 93 members of Congress, notes among other things that the Pentagon continued to provide funding for Afghan security forces, even though there were credible allegations of serious human rights allegations.

Both secretaries of Defense under the Obama administration, Ash Carter and Chuck Hagel, authorized U.S. Forces in Afghanistan to request expanded exemptions for human rights violators by exercising the “notwithstanding” clause. This clause in the DOD Appropriations Act has been exploited to skirt the Leahy Law, which prohibits funding to foreign forces when there is credible evidence of human rights violations.

“This type of abuse, appallingly, is a common practice,” Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy said, according to NBC News. “In fact, it is a virtual certainty that it is grossly underreported. The report also revealed that DOD circumvented the Leahy Law by using ‘notwithstanding’ authority without notifying Congress, even providing aid to Afghan units implicated in child abuse. That is inexcusable.”

The Pentagon approved “notwithstanding” clause to keep passing funds to 12 Afghan units responsible for 14 human rights violations in 2013.

As further noted by the report:

For nine additional units implicated, the USFOR-A commander recommended that DOD use the notwithstanding clause to continue to provide funding, except for U.S.-based professional training, minor site improvements and construction, and transportation services.

Unsurprisingly, some of the human rights issues examined by the report more broadly include child sexual assault incidents, a phenomenon known as bacha bazi.

According to SIGAR, 24 out of 37 individuals and organizations interviewed, stating they knew about child sexual exploitation by Afghan forces. In November, a Pentagon inspector general report came out with similar findings. U.S. service members were told that bacha bazi was a “culturally accepted practice,” and until media reports exposed abuse of Afghan boys, troops were not given any kind of guidance about the issue. Some troops were even told to ignore exploitation, though the new SIGAR report did not find any evidence of that order.

Two service members interviewed by SIGAR also stated they didn’t undergo any training about what to do if they witnessed abuse, despite seeing or hearing such abuse. Yet another service member said that troops on base heard the screams of a boy, and while they understood this was likely an example of brutal sexual abuse, the service members only laughed about it and did not report the incident.

As stated in the report, “The full extent of child sexual assault committed by Afghan security forces may never be known.”

This report, by Jonah Bennett, was cross posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using either the Spot.IM commenting system or the Facebook commenting system. If Spot.IM is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.