Obama to respond to Assad’s civilian massacre in Syria with ‘tougher talk’

Obama to respond to Assad’s civilian massacre in Syria with ‘tougher talk’

Petty tryant Bashar al-Assad has to be quaking in its boots. Make that “laughing himself into a fit.” The Obama administration as responded to Russia and Syria’s deadly air strikes against civilians by threatening to “tough talk” — literally.

A response to the continuing humanitarian crisis in Syria would “begin at tougher talk,” an administration official told Reuters Thursday. But before that is even an option, another official said the White House would have to “follow through on [Secretary of State John] Kerry’s threat and break off talks with the Russians.”

Obama has remained intransigent on Syria since the crisis began five years ago. Despite Syrian President Assad’s massacring of civilians across the country, two failed attempts at a ceasefire in the last year, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, a letter from 50 U.S. diplomats urging intervention, and the deaths of as many as 400,000 Syrians, the administration insists it has no recourse in Syria.

Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?

Obama’s unwillingness to get involved in Syria caused rebel groups, which were once secular, to join forces with radical Islamic terrorist organizations such as Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (JFS), formerly known as the Nusra Front.

Kerry made an attempt to reengage with Russia, Assad’s key ally, in September in order to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis. The two sides agreed on a week-long ceasefire with hopes that it would lead to a more permanent solution. The agreement was dead on arrival, with many Syrian opposition groups disregarding the ceasefire from the outset. Assad, backed by Russia, would resume fighting just hours after the ceasefire’s end, unleashing a torrent of air strikes against civilian positions. Kerry responded by warning Russia that the U.S. would cut off future talks.

The lightning-fast advance of Assad’s forces in the besieged city of Aleppo and Kerry’s failed diplomacy caught the administration off guard, two officials admitted to Reuters. The White House has now been forced to adopt new options, though Russia warns that any intervention by the U.S. would result in “terrible tectonic shifts” in the region.

This report, by Russ Read, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.