Quote of the Day: When is 5 inches not 5 inches?

Quote of the Day: When is 5 inches not 5 inches?

No, that’s not meant salaciously. It’s a question prompted by a blistering broadside on Britain’s Ministry of Defence in the Daily Star, a tabloid. The author takes the agency to task over its profligate ways.

The headline of the article, which evinces equal parts outrage and sarcasm, reads: “We just blew £183m on a five inch gun, but it’s ‘good value for taxpayers.'” The embedded quote is a snipe at the government, which claimed that this expenditure is a sound investment in Britain’s security.

The complaint seems curious in light of an article I found online. The piece, which ran at the website of the U.S. Naval Institute, seems to indicate that a round of ammunition for a 5-inch, 54-caliber deck gun can run as high as $50,000.

The problem, it turns out, is a result of a misunderstanding on the part of the Daily Star writer Margi Murphy of what exactly the “five inches” measure. The UK Defence Journal tweets:

toy gun suspension

Many on Twitter had fun with the error. One person tweeted:

Murphy herself was a good sport about the goof, tweeting:

Ben Bowles

Ben Bowles

Ben Bowles is a freelance writer and regular contributor to "Liberty Unyielding."

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.