Quote of the Day: When is 5 inches not 5 inches?

Quote of the Day: When is 5 inches not 5 inches?
Image: Shutterstock

No, that’s not meant salaciously. It’s a question prompted by a blistering broadside on Britain’s Ministry of Defence in the Daily Star, a tabloid. The author takes the agency to task over its profligate ways.

The headline of the article, which evinces equal parts outrage and sarcasm, reads: “We just blew £183m on a five inch gun, but it’s ‘good value for taxpayers.'” The embedded quote is a snipe at the government, which claimed that this expenditure is a sound investment in Britain’s security.

The complaint seems curious in light of an article I found online. The piece, which ran at the website of the U.S. Naval Institute, seems to indicate that a round of ammunition for a 5-inch, 54-caliber deck gun can run as high as $50,000.

The problem, it turns out, is a result of a misunderstanding on the part of the Daily Star writer Margi Murphy of what exactly the “five inches” measure. The UK Defence Journal tweets:

toy gun suspension

Many on Twitter had fun with the error. One person tweeted:

Murphy herself was a good sport about the goof, tweeting:

Ben Bowles

Ben Bowles

Ben Bowles is a freelance writer.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.