NYT reporter: Quoting global warming skeptics just ‘perpetuates a lie’

NYT reporter: Quoting global warming skeptics just ‘perpetuates a lie’
A scene from "Merchants of Doubt" that depicts a future in which global warming is not addressed.

A New York Times environmental reporter told Columbia University journalism students that presenting balance in an article about global warming is tantamount to perpetuating a lie.

“It is a lie to say that global warming poses no danger,” New York Times reporter Justin Gillis told students after a screening of the movie “Merchants of Doubt,” reports The Federalist. Said Gillis:

Journalists care about the truth — that’s my only care in life, to find the truth. To act as if the evidence is half and half is to tell a lie. I refuse to perpetuate that lie.

These people need to be labeled what they are: climate change deniers. This is much like the abortion wars: what term you use signals what side you are on.

Emphasizing the importance of appearing impartial while still being an activist, Gillis told students he liked to use the word “deniers” for “people who oppose climate science,” and that these people should never be called “skeptics.”

Gillis recently made headlines for a report on funding that Harvard-Smithsonian scientist Willie Soon got from the utility Southern Company. Gillis wrote that Soon did not disclose that the funding came from an energy company that used coal, arguing the failure to disclose constituted a conflict of interest.

The New York Times report sparked a congressional investigation into the finances of scientists who have challenged the Obama administration’s views on global warming. Lawmakers also inquired after industry groups and free market think tanks about their funding of science. Gillis’s reporting also included quotes from Harvard historian Naomi Oreskes, the co-author of the book that became the documentary “Merchants of Doubt.”

The documentary by “Food Inc.” director Robert Kenner attempts to paint global warming skeptics as old Cold Warriors who are paranoid that climate issues are another proxy for socialism. The film also attempts to argue that the fossil fuel industry has taken a page out of the tobacco industry playbook by funding slick PR-types and shady scientists to cast doubt on global warming.

Interestingly enough, Gillis’s New York Times report, which featured Oreskes, came out just three weeks before “Merchants of Doubt” was released. Gillis also quoted former Greenpeace activist Kert Davies — who has been giving information out to the press about Soon since 2009.

After the Times story came out, Davies, who now heads up the Climate Investigations Center, wrote in his blog:

We have an idea for coming clean, a remedy … the illustrious Smithsonian Institution should sponsor free screenings nationwide of the upcoming theatrical film Merchants of Doubt, pay for school kids everywhere to go see it.

Maybe half a million dollars worth of screenings.

In the days that followed Gillis’s report, other news outlets began poking holes in accusations that Soon violated conflict of interest standards. Bloggers even pointed out that other scientists who similarly got money from institutions with ties to fossil fuels companies that were not disclosed.

This report, by Michael Bastasch, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.