Report: Regulations stifle productivity

Report: Regulations stifle productivity

From 1997 through 2010, industries with the fewest federal regulations experienced productivity growth almost twice that of the most-regulated industries, according to a new chart released by the Mercatus Center.

Economist Antony Davies reached that conclusion based on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Mercatus’ RegData tool, which “counts the number of binding words that appear in the Code of Federal Regulations and cross-references those word counts with the industries to which they apply.”(RELATED: Feds List 141 New Regulations in Only Three Days)

Davies calculates that output per hour increased 64 percent in the least-regulated industries, but only 34 percent in the most-regulated ones. At the same time, unit labor costs decreased by 4 percent for the least-regulated, but rose by 20 percent in the most-regulated industries. (RELATED: Poll: 47 Percent of Americans Say Too Much Government Regulation)

According to Davies, regulations tend to reduce productivity by either restricting competition or by causing producers “to alter production levels and processes in ways that they would not have otherwise chosen.”

Regulations that create barriers to entry for new firms limit competition in a given industry, lessening the pressure on established firms to reduce costs. Occupational licensing requirements, for instance, can raise the cost of certain services by reducing the options available to consumers.

Other types of regulations affect firms’ economic behavior directly, which invariably imposes economic costs since their default behavior is to attempt to maximize profits. “Consequently,” Davies says, “productivity in industries should decline as the regulatory burden placed on them increases.”(RELATED: Hidden Tax: Report Estimates Regulation Costs Economy $1.75 Trillion)

The chart builds on research originally published in May, in which Davies fully explains his methodology and provides a “relative regulatory index” for comparing the regulatory burden between different industries.

Follow Peter Fricke on Twitter

This report, by Peter Fricke, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.