What the MSM omitted from its reports on North Korea’s possible test of an H-bomb

What the MSM omitted from its reports on North Korea’s possible test of an H-bomb

This weekend North Korea conducted its sixth nuclear test, claiming afterwards that it had detonated a Hydrogen bomb. Although that claim hasn’t been confirmed, according to most sources the weapon tested is significantly more powerful than those tested previously.

Even more worrisome is the following statement released by North Korea’s state-run KCNA news service has not received much coverage in the mainstream:

The H-bomb, the explosive power of which is adjustable from tens kiloton to hundreds kiloton, is a multi-functional thermonuclear nuke with great destructive power which can be detonated even at high altitudes for super-powerful EMP attack (electromagnetic pulse) according to strategic goals.

An EMP attack could be launched from a submarine, ship using a low-yield nuclear missile, or by one of the ballistic missiles the Norks claim to be able to arm. The resulting explosion would occur at at high altitude above the U.S. mainland. This kind of attack would create a blackout of the Eastern grid that supplies 75% of power to the nation.

Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?

In May of this year, Aaron Klein of Breitbart interviewed Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and chief of staff of the Congressional EMP Commission.

“If you wanted to win a New Korean war,” said Pry, “one of the things you would certainly consider doing is taking out the United States homeland itself.”

Pry surmised the North Koreans may be taking the idea from a Soviet plan during the Cold War to attack the U.S. with an EMP as part of a larger surprise assault aimed at crippling the U.S. military.

“During the Cold War, the Russians had a secret weapon they called a fractional orbital bombardment system,” he explained. “And the idea was to do a surprise EMP attack against the United States by disguising a warhead as a satellite. Because a satellite trajectory is different from an ICBM trajectory that is aiming to go into a city. You know, for accuracy on an ICBM you launch it on a lower energy, 45-degree angle that follows a classic ballistic trajectory. Like a rifle. To land your missile on a city.”

Given the reliance on technology for communications in the twenty-first century, an EMP attack by a foreign power would devastate our military’s ability to coordinate defenses against an invading army.

A few days before his interview with Klein, Pry penned an op-ed for Newsmax that explained what North Korea would need to accomplish this goal:

I am looking at an unclassified U.S. Government chart that shows a 10-kiloton warhead (the power of the Hiroshima A-Bomb) detonated at an altitude of 70 kilometers will generate an EMP field inflicting upset and damage on unprotected electronics. …

On April 30, South Korean officials told The Korea Times and YTN TV that North Korea’s test of a medium-range missile on April 29 was not a failure, as widely reported in the world press, because it was deliberately detonated at 72 kilometers altitude. 72 kilometers is the optimum burst height for a 10-Kt warhead making an EMP attack. …

According to South Korean officials, “It’s believed the explosion was a test to develop a nuclear weapon different from existing ones.” Japan’s Tetsuro Kosaka writes in Nikkei, “Pyongyang could be saying, ‘We could launch an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack if things get really ugly.’”

If an EMP attack did take place, it would be beyond anything we have seen before. The Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack estimates that within 12 months following a nationwide blackout, “up to 90% of the US population could perish from starvation, disease, and societal breakdown.”

Think about what’s going on right now in Texas because of the lack of electric power or about Superstorm Sandy’s crippling effects on the East Coast for five days in 2012. Now increase the factor of people affected to three-quarters of the U.S. population and the length of the period effected to months or even years.

Newt Gingrich said in May:

The grid disruption caused by an EMP could take months to years to repair. Non-perishable foods would spoil from lack of refrigeration. Hospitals would run out of life-saving, temperature-controlled medications within days. Dialysis and other medical devices would stop working. Water systems that rely on electricity would stop pumping water and pipes would burst from the weight and pressure. The cascade of consequences of a protracted regional power outage would be devastating.

What he didn’t say is what will happen to “civilized society” when our basic survival instincts take over.

President Trump anticipated this threat. In early May the White House announced:

President Trump ordered the federal government to prepare for a devastating cyber attack against America’s electric grid amid growing fears foreign states are set to carry out attacks aimed at plunging the nation into darkness.

A presidential order signed Thursday directed key federal agencies to assess preparations for a prolonged power outage resulting from cyber attacks designed to disrupt the power grid.

An assessment of the danger must be carried out by the Energy Department, Homeland Security, DNI and state and local governments to examine the readiness of the United State to manage a shutdown of the power grid. The assessment will also identify gaps and shortcomings in efforts that would be used restore power.

Cross posted at The Lid

Jeff Dunetz

Jeff Dunetz

Jeff Dunetz is editor and publisher of the The Lid, and a weekly political columnist for the Jewish Star and TruthRevolt. He has also contributed to Breitbart.com, HotAir, and PJ Media’s Tattler.

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.