Official from Obama’s State Dept. explains why administration never said ‘radical Islam’

Official from Obama’s State Dept. explains why administration never said ‘radical Islam’

A former Department of State official confessed Monday that the reason no one in the Obama administration referred to acts of terror by jihadists as “radical Islam” was fear of alienating Muslim allies.

In an op-ed written for The New York Times, Richard Stengel, who served as under secretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs under Barack Obama, said there was a very clear reason why no one could – or did – label various acts of terror as the product of “radical Islam” and instead used the much less loaded term “violent extremism.”

According to Stengel, Obama and his administration shied away from the term “radical Islam” not because they was “too timid or too politically correct,” despite harsh criticisms from Republicans and especially President Donald Trump.

“To defeat radical Islamic extremism, we needed our Islamic allies – the Jordanians, the Emiratis, the Egyptians, the Saudis – and they believed that term unfairly vilified a whole religion,” Stengel wrote.

“They also told us that they did not consider the Islamic State to be Islamic, and its grotesque violence against Muslims proved it,” he added.

Stengel argues that since the Trump administration seems dead-set on using “radical Islam” to describe the Islamic State and other groups, we should at least let Muslim allies know that it refers only to an extremely small subset of Muslims, so as not to offend our allies.

But still, Stengel still has serious misgivings, as he thinks it is “not up to us to say what is Islamic and what is not.” Attempting to do so, he adds, may very well boost recruiting efforts by these terror groups.

During the 2016 presidential election cycle, then-President Barack Obama claimed that groups like ISIS and al Qaeda had deceptively cloaked themselves in Islamic theology to justify acts of barbarism. And although, as Stengel noted, the administration has tried to avoid saying what is Islamic and what isn’t, Obama firmly stated that “there’s no religious rationale that would justify in any way any of the things that they do.”

This report, by Jonah Bennett, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments