Another ‘Obama first’: WH hiring DOJ investigators with knowledge of political opponents’ tax info

Another ‘Obama first’: WH hiring DOJ investigators with knowledge of political opponents’ tax info

President Barack Obama’s White House hired at least two Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who accessed conservative groups’ confidential taxpayer information while defending the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) during the targeting scandal.

The two were among 10 Justice Department Tax Division lawyers Obama has kept on the White House staff without taxpayer privacy training since April 2009, nonprofit government watchdog Cause of Action Institute (CofA) said in a report made public Wednesday.

Obama “is the first president to have recruited litigation specialists from the DOJ Tax Division, some of whom had knowledge of confidential taxpayer information concerning his political opponents,” the report said. “The DOJ has supplied a regular stream of Tax Division lawyers to the Obama White House for more than seven years, all without any apparent guidance or safeguards to ensure against the unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information.”

Using Department of Justice tax lawyers may be unique to the current White House, but for “nearly as long as the IRS has existed, presidents have weaponized it against their foes,” the report said. “The Obama administration has made frequent and damaging use of the IRS as a political weapon.”

The report pointed to the IRS’s illegal targeting of Tea Party and conservative non-profit applicants, which led to multiple lawsuits against the agency. At least two Department of Justice attorneys, Norah Bringer and Andrew Strelka, defended the IRS in the resulting litigation, then were hired by the White House.

They also defended the IRS and its Inspector General during Freedom of Information Act lawsuits regarding tax records. Bringer even withdrew from a case on Friday, June 6, 2014, and began at the White House the next Monday.

Those lawyers “accessed confidential taxpayer information otherwise restricted from disclosure to the president and White House officials” during the lawsuits “and that knowledge likely made them attractive to the White House,” CofA said. That information “might then be disclosed to and used by the administration to target its political enemies.”

Additionally, none of the 10 attorneys were provided “context-specific training, guidelines, or screening procedures designed to ensure that they comply with the strict limitations on disclosing confidential taxpayer information to the president and other White House employees,” the report said.

Access to confidential taxpayer information gained while representing the government in tax litigation is “perhaps the best answer to why Obama wanted Tax Division lawyers,” the report said.

Past presidents have used tax information to vet potential appointees, but that duty has typically fallen to White House-detailed IRS officials.

Department of Justice tax attorneys’ “primary skills are as litigators,” the report said. “A more effective route would have been to request detailees from the IRS.”

Department of Justice leaders advertised the White House positions as involving duties beyond vetting potential presidential appointees.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz declined Cause of Action Institute’s request to investigate White House-detailed attorneys due to a lack of jurisdiction. The pending Inspector General Access Act would eliminate this issue, according to the nonprofit, who suggested additional legislative fixes.

“Without legislative intervention and reform at the DOJ and IRS, the president’s ability to misuse taxpayer information will continue unabated,” the report said.

Follow Ethan on Twitter

This report, by Ethan Barton, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.