Sanders supporters threaten to hunt down, kill NYT reporter for proclaiming Hillary nominee

Sanders supporters threaten to hunt down, kill NYT reporter for proclaiming Hillary nominee
Frankenstein, 1931 Image: YouTube screen grab via Movieclips)

So this is what Democrats’ vaunted civility looks like!

A day after New York Times reporters Amy Chozick and Patrick Healy published an article noting that Hillary Clinton had clinched the Democratic nomination according to a survey(!), irate supporters of Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders swore out a fatwa, at least on Chozick’s head, prompting her to tweet:

 

The mob’s worries that Chozick and Healy had jumped the gun and in so doing skunked Tuesday’s primary races suggest they can’t tell the difference between fear-mongering and objective reporting. Apart from the source ascription in the headline, the article’s lede indicates that “an Associated Press survey of Democratic superdelegates” found that Clinton had locked up “enough of them” to stave off a contested convention.

Despite Clinton’s win last night in the all-important California and New Jersey primaries, Sanders has promised to soldier on in his quest to replace her as the Democratic nominee. The enthusiasm of his backers and relative lack of the same among Clinton supporters suggests Sanders may be in a position to make significant demands at the party’s convention in Philadelphia next month. The “Berners” may, thus, want to hang onto their pitchforks a little longer.

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.