If you like your Common Core, you can keep it; if you don’t like it … well, tough

If you like your Common Core, you can keep it; if you don’t like it … well, tough

The old order changeth yielding place to the same old, same old.

With apologies to Alfred, Lord Tennyson, that is the bottom line from New Jersey, where a committee established to review Common Core after Gov. Chris Christie declared the standards were “not working,” recommended keeping the vast majority of these guidelines, according to report released Monday.

New Jersey’s Standards Review Committee, which incorporated input from teachers, administrators and parents, was set-up by Christie last May to review Common Core. Christie said the standards were “simply not working” for the state.

Like many other Republicans, Christie was originally a Common Core supporter, but repudiated it early in 2015, shortly before he announced his presidential candidacy. Christie’s well-timed epiphany left many conservatives unconvinced that his change of heart was genuine.

Now, the committee has delivered its recommendations to the New Jersey State Board of Education. It proposed 232 changes to the 1,427 Common Core standards the state uses to guide math and English education from kindergarten through high school. Of these 232 changes, most are minor, slightly adjusting wording or adding additional clarification. For example, the committee proposed changing a standard for K-12 students that expects them to “ask and answer questions about key details in a text,” to also note that those questions are of the “who, what, where, why” variety.

Some of the changes, though, are more substantive. For instance, English standards have been altered to de-emphasize the close reading of unfamiliar texts (a favorite approach in Common Core). Instead, the proposal calls for more emphasis on background knowledge and context when reading texts. Several English standards have also been shifted to new grade levels. Almost all significant changes are to English standards, while math is almost entirely unchanged, save for some adjustments to wording.

Kimberley Harrington, New Jersey’s chief academic officer, emphasized that they were not scrapping Common Core. “We were not looking to develop a whole new set of standards, but rather to improve upon what we had,” Harrington said, according to NJ.com.

Notably, the standards leave enough of Common Core in place that the committee recommended the state keep using standardized tests produced by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) — a multi-state consortium creating Common Core-aligned tests that has endured much backlash. Last year, several thousand New Jersey students opted-out of PARCC tests in protest.

The recommendations will be reviewed and approved by the board of education before taking effect. If approved, the new standards will be adopted starting in 2017.

The relatively moderate alterations to Common Core are similar to those seen in many other states that have chosen to review the standards. In North Carolina, an effort to overhaul Common Core stumbled when a committee failed to recommend any specific changes. In other states like South Carolina and Indiana, anti-Common Core activists were disappointed by “replacement” standards they say sported mere cosmetic changes.

This report, by Blake Neff, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.