If you’ve wondered why millions of people worldwide are suddenly migrating, ask the U.N.

If you’ve wondered why millions of people worldwide are suddenly migrating, ask the U.N.

It’s called Agenda 330, and it has nothing to do really with events in Syria or incursions by ISIS.

The millions of refugees flooding Western Europe and in at least 180 cities in America are being purposely redistributed as part of an overall plan to integrate global policies that eradicate national sovereignty.

It’s important to understand that “refugee resettlement” is directly linked to the United Nations’s definition and goals for sustainable development. Sustainable development has its overarching objective the integration of “economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity.”

The “vetted refugees,” moreover, are chosen by the International Organization for Migration (IOM), a U.S. federal contractor in concert with the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, António Guterres. All costs associated with refugees being imported to America are fully funded by the U.S. taxpayer.

To be clear: Non-Americans are “vetting” refugees, chosen by non-Americans to come to America at American taxpayers’ expense.

This past September, the U.N’s world summit, “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” was held in New York where world leaders adopted the “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Agenda 2030 includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and represents the culmination of over two years of “stakeholder” negotiations directly resulting in what the world is now experiencing: expansive immigrant migration as an outgrowth of the U.N.’s global development goals.

IOM announced, “It is now up to the international community as a whole to ensure that we achieve these global goals over the next fifteen years, making the world a better place for all, including migrants.”

While Barack Obama is very much involved with Agenda 2030, he did not initiate attempts to globalize America. This was already underway thanks to George H.W. Bush, who in 1992 signed and began adopting components of Agenda 21, which was presented to 178 world leaders at the 1992 U.N. Earth Summit. Next, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order No. 12852 to create the President’s Council on Sustainable Development. (This is why in 2003, U.S. environmental policies began streamlining with U.N. directives outlined in Agenda 21.)

Under Agenda 2030 all societies must conform to U.N. environmental impact goals that incorporate global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.

“The New Agenda” (para. 29) of the Agenda 2030 document states:

We recognize the positive contribution of migrants for inclusive growth and sustainable development. We also recognize that international migration is a multi-dimensional reality of major relevance for the development of countries of origin, transit and destination, which requires coherent and comprehensive responses. We will cooperate internationally to ensure safe, orderly and regular migration involving full respect for human rights and the humane treatment of migrants regardless of migration status, of refugees and of displaced persons. Such cooperation should also strengthen the resilience of communities hosting refugees, particularly in developing countries. We underline the right of migrants to return to their country of citizenship, and recall that States must ensure that their returning nationals are duly received.

Both the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government have already supported and are enabling the U.N.’s agenda for a globalized regime.

Cross-posted at Constitution.com

 

Bethany Blankley

Bethany Blankley

Bethany Blankley is senior editor for Constitution.com. She has written for the Washington Times, Newsday, Western Journalism, Townhall, and the Christian Post. Her syndicated show, "America's Betrayal," can be heard on Conservative Review Radio and WAAR.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.