Disgraced Healthcare.gov firm ensnared in Sandy recovery flimflam in NJ

Disgraced Healthcare.gov firm ensnared in Sandy recovery flimflam in NJ
The Obamas greet CGI senior vice president Toni Townes-Whitley and husband at White House holiday party in 2010.

A federal watchdog is throwing a red flag on a $60.2 million Hurricane Sandy Recovery contract New Jersey officials awarded to the Canadian firm behind the disastrous Obamacare program’s Healthcare.gov web site.

CGI Federal lost its $93 million contract for Healthcare.gov after it crashed within hours of going live in 2013 and contained so many design flaws that the Obama administration had to assemble an emergency team to make the Obamacare web site minimally operable.

Five months before that widely publicized digital disaster, CGI won the New Jersey contract in a procurement process that the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s inspector general now says was rife with serious flaws.

New Jersey officials were required to comply with federal procurement rules because the $60.2 million were awarded as part of Washington’s $1.5 billion disaster recovery assistance to the state in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.

The contract was to design and operate the Sandy Integrated Recovery Operations and Management System for administering the federal funds. New Jersey officials claimed they complied with all applicable federal requirements in their selection of CGI.

But state officials “did not procure services and products for its system in accordance with federal procurement standards or comply with all federal cost principle requirements for supporting salary and wage compensation,” the IG said in a report made public late Friday. The report also noted:

Specifically, it did not prepare an independent cost estimate and analysis before awarding the system contract to the only responsive bidder. It also did not ensure that option years were awarded competitively and included provisions in its request for quotation that restricted competition.

Further, it did not ensure that software was purchased competitively and that the winning contractor had adequate documentation to support labor costs charged by its employees.

The process appeared to have been designed to ensure CGI would win the contract. The state’s request for bids “required potential contractors to complete a rate schedule that had predetermined labor categories matching those of CGI Federal and had predetermined labor hours, which restricted competition,” the IG said.

“Of the 26 predetermined labor categories included in the State’s schedule, 22 of them matched the exact wording of labor category titles from CGI Federal’s authorized price-list on the U.S. General Services Administration’s web site.”

Similar problems marked the process by which CGI won the Healthcare.gov contract. The Washington Examiner reported in 2014 that federal officials were “tight-lipped about why CGI was chosen or how it happened. They also refuse to say if other firms competed with CGI, or if there was ever a public solicitation for building Healthcare.gov, the backbone of Obamacare’s problem-plagued web portal.”

The Healthcare.gov contract went to CGI because federal officials “used what amounts to a federal procurement system loophole to award the work to the Canadian firm,” the Examiner said.

CGI also lost a major contract from a Canadian province in 2012 after missing multiple deadlines in designing an online medical registry.

The New Jersey contract may be the next big government contract at risk for CGI because the IG recommended that HUD’s deputy assistant secretary for grant programs determine whether the entire award should be cancelled and bidding re-opened.

This report, by Mark Tapscott, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.