White college students barred from attending campus meeting of Racialized Students’ Collective

Two white students at Ryerson University in Toronto were barred last week from a meeting of the Racialized Students’ Collective, a group that, according to its Facebook page, is dedicated to “building an anti-racism community on campus.” The student newspaper, the Ryersonian, reports that Trevor Hewitt and Julia Knope, both first-year journalism students, claim they were told that because they were not victims of racialization, they were not allowed to attend the meeting and report on the event.

Hewitt and Knope said they made eye contact with an unidentified woman who appeared to be setting up for the event. She approached Hewitt and Knope and asked if they had ever been racialized.

Poster advertising Racialized Students event

Hewitt said he then told the woman he wanted to cover the meeting for an assignment. He said the woman told him that because he was not a racialized student, he could not sit in on the meeting. Hewitt and Knope then left the room.

It’s hard to understand how excluding outsiders, and especially would-be racists, from the meeting advances the group’s goal of —again according to the website — “fostering an anti-racist environment through campus-wide services, campaigns and events.” Absent an outside viewpoint, how can meetings be anything more than an airing of grievances? RSU coordinator Vajdaan Tanveer, when asked about the imposed segregation, seemed to confirm that that’s exactly what transpires, telling the Ryersonian:

We don’t want [racialized] students to feel intimidated, that they can’t speak their mind because they are afraid of being judged or something they say might be used against them.

Finally there is a troubling assumption underlying the shibboleth behind Hewitt’s and Knope’s exclusion that only people of color can be “racialized.” Following the death of Trayvon Martin, there were dozens of instances in which black gangs physically attacked and severely beat randomly selected white males. In several cases, the white victim died. Would RSC rationalize that these were somehow “payback,” rather than racist hate crimes? And even if they did, how would they would explain away the rash of “knockouts” that were all the rage in 2014?

Related Articles

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.