Imagine if the GOP did use ‘reconciliation’ to kill Obamacare once and for all

Imagine if the GOP did use ‘reconciliation’ to kill Obamacare once and for all

I had to laugh yesterday when I read the lede of a piece by the Washington Times’s Cheryl Chumley that advised that “Republicans … are eyeing a little-known, little-used budget too [sic: tool] called “reconciliation” to “bring down Obamacare.” First of all, using reconciliation — aka the “nuclear option” — has been under consideration by GOP lawmakers since 2011. Second, that parliamentary procedure, which allows a measure to pass the Senate with 51 votes instead of than the normally required 60, is hardly “little known.” It became something of a household word in 2010 when Democrats cynically used it to pass Obamacare (as Chumley herself notes later in the article).

Using it to repeal the benighted health care law would, however, be the ultimate revenge fantasy.

Chumley is correct in her analysis of the potential blowback. She writes:

President Obama would then have to deal with the repeal package on his desk — and while he isn’t likely to sign it, he would have to face the public relations message the Republican Party would send.

And of benefit to Republicans: Sending the repeal to the president would strike a sharp contrast between the two political parties at a time when voters will be mulling the next White House selection.

A poll conducted by McLaughlin & Associates in late September found that 59.8% of likely voters want to see Obamacare repealed, with another 44.3% saying they would prefer to see the current health care law replaced by something better. That is in part attributable to costs associated with health care policies under the law being greater than before — not lower, as the president promised when he sold his false bill of goods to the American people. That reality was advertised in 2010, the year the law passed, in a study carried out by none other than MIT economist Jonathan Gruber:

[The] study predicted about 90 percent of individuals without employer-sponsored or public insurance would see their premiums spike by an average of 41 percent. Once tax subsidies were factored in, about 60 percent of those in the individual market were projected to see their premiums go up 31 percent, according to his analysis.

Related Articles

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.