Woman murdered her toddlers, but there’s much more to this story of depravity

Woman murdered her toddlers, but there’s much more to this story of depravity

Elaine Campione of Toronto is not the first mother to murder her own children, sadly enough. But the manner in which she killed her daughters, ages 3 and 19 months, bespeaks a level of madness that is beyond comprehension.

Locked in a bitter custody battle with her ex-husband, Campione resolved that if she couldn’t keep her children, then neither would he. So she placed the angelic little girls in a warm bath and urged them to blow bubbles. As they did, she held their tiny heads under the water until they drowned.

If the gruesome story had ended there, it would be horrifying enough — but there’s more. After killing the children, Campione curled their hair, clad them in their finest princess dresses, and arranged them on a bed, clasping hands. She then recorded this macabre scene with a video camera, in which she asked her former husband:

Here, are you happy now? The children are gone. How does that make you feel?

Serena, 3, and Sophia, 19 months
Serena, 3, and Sophia, 19 months

Campione was convicted on two counts of first-degree murder, but is now appealing her conviction. According to the Toronto Sun, her attorneys are claiming that their their argument that she could be considered not criminally responsible due to a mental defect was scuttled by the judge in the case.

At the … trial, both sides agreed she was mentally ill — she’d been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, suffered from paranoia and delusions and was involuntarily hospitalized in the past. From the chilling home video she made before and after the murders, it was also agreed that the mom was aware that what she was doing was legally wrong.

The crux of the trial was whether she understood it was also morally wrong.

[…]

The defence theory was that Campione was so psychotic she actually believed drowning her daughters was protecting them from her ex-husband and would be seen as morally justifiable by society. “She believed they were unsafe on earth and that by sending them to heaven, she was providing them with a safe haven where they could have a happy life together,” wrote her … lawyers….

Unsurprisingly, the jury never bought it. Now her appeal team is contending that the judge, Justice Alfred Stong, didn’t effectively explain the issue of “moral blameworthiness” to the jury.

(h/t BadBlue)

Related Articles

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.