Clift sticks to her guns, insists Chris Stevens not ‘murdered’

Clift sticks to her guns, insists Chris Stevens not ‘murdered’
Eleanor Clift

Daily Beast columnist Eleanor Clift was thrown a life line Tuesday — which she promptly threw back at her would-be rescuer.

Clift was invited to participate in a telephone interview with Newsmax’s Steve Malzberg, who gave her a chance to retract the outrageous claim she had made two days earlier, when she asserted on “The McLaughlin Group” that Ambassador Chris Stevens had not been “murdered” in Benghazi (she used air quotes to set off the word) but died of smoke inhalation.

She had also insisted on the Sunday show that the attack on the U.S. foreign mission was prompted by an anti-Islamic video, a theory discounted long ago.

Clift stuck to her guns when given the chance to explain her statement.

After she and Malzberg discussed Karl Rove’s recent remarks about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the host brought up her earlier Benghazi statement at about the 3:50 mark of the interview (below). Clift firmly dug her heels in:

I was taking issue with the sort of glib use of the word ‘murdered. I think dying of smoke inhalation in the safe room of a CIA outpost has a slightly different feeling, and my point is that it was a very chaotic event. The CIA was involved which is why there was a lot of confusion initially, and that all the questions that this special committee is raising have been asked and answered in previous investigations.

Malzberg analogized the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. “If you die in a terrorist attack, were you not murdered?” he asked.

“Sir, I’m going to stick with my explanation,” Clift responded.


Michael Dorstewitz

Michael Dorstewitz

Michael Dorstewitz is a recovering Michigan trial lawyer and former research vessel deck officer. He has written extensively for BizPac Review.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments