History will not look kindly on Obama’s boundless ignorance

History will not look kindly on Obama’s boundless ignorance

Obama_angry_1“Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.”  John F. Kennedy

“Negotiation in the classic diplomatic sense assumes parties more anxious to agree than to disagree.”  Dean Acheson

“I shouldn’t have to offer anything” — Barack H. Obama

Behold: Three statements by prominent U.S. statesmen of their day on the art of negotiation. Two are presidents, the other a secretary of state, but only one of them betrays a total ignorance of the job description of a leader. If you can’t pick out the quote, chances are you voted for Obama in 2012.

Obama’s latest act of cluelessness came up in an interview Monday morning with Steve Inskeep of NPR. Here is the full context of Obama’s remark:

Inskeep: As we talk, Mr. President, we’re on a day when, obviously, a shutdown is looming. You said earlier that you were going to be talking to the leaders. Did you mean Republican leaders? And if so, which ones?

Obama: Well, I’m going to be talking to all of them. And we still have a window, there’s still an opportunity during the course of this day, to avert a shutdown and make sure that we are paying our bills.

Inskeep: What can you offer?

Obama: And — if — if we — Steve, when you say, ‘What can I offer?’ — I shouldn’t have to offer anything. They’re not doing me a favor by paying for things that they have already approved for the government to do. That’s part of their basic function of government; that’s not doing me a favor. That’s doing what the American people sent them here to do, carrying out their responsibilities.

It is fascinating that Obama mentions the carrying out of responsibilities, of “doing what the American people sent them here to do.” You have to wonder if he ever thinks about what the American people sent him to Washington to do.

He is forever telling other people what their job is. In April of 2012, he announced that if the Supreme Court struck down the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act, their actions would amount to “judicial activism.” In spite of his gratuitous bullying, the high court upheld the vehicle for funding his signature legislative achievement.

Now he is reading the riot act to Congress, or more specifically to the Republican-controlled House, for requesting changes to a law that more Americans oppose than support. The changes — which included elimination of a cynical tax on medical devices and a requirement that members of Congress and the president to enroll in the plan — were summarily dismissed by an intransigent Democratic-controlled Senate. And yet the president has the chutzpah to accuse the GOP of shirking its responsibilities when he is clearly abdicating his own.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook.


Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments