Report: North Korea tests chemical weapons on disabled citizens in ‘Hospital 83’

Report: North Korea tests chemical weapons on disabled citizens in ‘Hospital 83’

Korea Times photo by Kim Se jeongToday, John Kerry gave an annoyingly emotional plea during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Syria, where he evoked images of innocent civilians suffering under Bashar al-Assad’s chemical weapons program. Kerry repeatedly said that one of the fears is that chemical weapons will not “fall into the wrong hands.”

How do the advocates for a military strike on Syria have such confidence that militants do not already have access to these weapons? Why is murder by bombing or shooting not as bad as murder by chemical weapons? If the emotional argument is to be evoked, then wouldn’t military strikes be justified wherever injustices occur?

Why do we ignore the plight of Coptic Christians, women and gays in the Middle East, the Christians who have been displaced in Nigeria by Boko Haram or the 100k innocents who were already killed in Syria? Why does that brutality somehow not warrant United States intervention?

How about the people being used as guinea pigs in North Korea?

A report, sponsored by the British Embassy, published in May called, the “Status of Women’s Rights in the Context of Socio-Economic Changes in the DPRK” was written by the Citizens’ Alliance for North Korean Human Rights (NKHR) “after a series of interviews with 60 female defectors who left the North between 2010 and 2012.”

One particularly appalling paragraph reads:

There is an island with ‘Hospital 83’ to which disabled persons are being sent for medical tests such as dissection of body parts, as well as tests of biological and chemical weapons. [Emphasis added]

Has anyone looked into this?

How about this:

Another person with a police background in North Korea reported that a similar institution practicing chemical and biological tests on disabled and criminals is in a secluded mountainous area of North Hamgyong Province, from where two healthy people (criminals) allegedly escaped spreading information about the tests. [Emphasis added]

Creepy. What is America planning on doing about these injustices?

The weenie recommendation by the writers of the report:

North Korea should be strongly condemned and urged to stop these inhumane practices on the disabled and political enemies.

It is not that Syria should not be held accountable. But what, exactly, is the goal? What is the criteria? If it was chemical weapons, than Obama and Kerry and friends would have been strong supporters of the war in Iraq. It is not imminent threat, so what is it?

John Kerry said this weekend:

Bashar al-Assad now joins the list of Adolph Hitler and Saddam Hussein [i.e., other rulers who] have used these weapons in time of war…

Color me confused. Why was it bad that the United States went to war with Iraq?

Follow Renee Nal on Twitter @ReneeNal and Facebook. Check out her news and political commentary on Tavern KeepersGather and the Examiner for news you won’t find in the mainstream media. Renee is also a guest blogger for the Shire Blog.

 


Renee Nal

Renee Nal

Renee Nal is a co-founder of TavernKeepers.com, a news and political commentary site founded by former Glenn Beck interns. She is also the National Conservative Examiner. Renee is an associate producer for Trevor Loudon's political documentary, 'The Enemies Within.'

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments