Obama's open invitation to a terrorist attack – and they'll be in the right

Obama's open invitation to a terrorist attack – and they'll be in the right

DCNukedPresident Wonderful currently has the CIA on stand-by on the Jordanian-Syrian border to flood Syria with more boom sticks than the openly al-Qaeda allied rebels know what to do with.

Obama has knowingly, willingly and intelligently made the decision to saddle up with the al-Qaeda forces in Syria.

But you wouldn’t know that if you relied on The New York Times, the BBC, The Guardian, CNN, anything with Joy Behar or any of the other English-speaking de facto affiliates of al-Jazeera.

Mr. Awesome is sending weapons to the same terrorists that attacked us on 9/11? NO WAY! Yes way, but please don’t take my word for it. The source article I’ve cited has two separate reliable sources verifying, yes – the fact, that Barack Hussein Obama is stockpiling weapons to send to al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria.

But I Digress…

Needless to say, Syria’s embattled big cheese, Bashar al-Assad, is going to be über-urinated off big time once all those American, European, and Saudi rifles, pistols, grenades, mortars, and anti-tank weapons cross the border.

In spite of sequestration, I guess there’s still enough foldin’ green floating around to ship some old AT-4s off to the bad guys… oh, and take a $100,000,000 African vacation.

And that’s not just my opinion concerning the arms. It’s according to the Wall Street Journal (see citation above).

But I Digress, Yet Again…

Gang, who is Bashie Assad’s numero uno BFF in the whole wide world? That’s right, the Islamic Republic of Iran (aka: The land of insane mullahs and at least one of Jeff Dunham’s dummies.) Hey, and don’t forget those fine fellows with . They’re almost as bonkers for Bashar as the Iranians.

But I Digress for a Third Time…

Please consider this for a moment: Once those weapons destines for the al-Qaeda “rebels” cross the border, would it be a reasonable assumption that Assad could and would consider that an act of war by the United States? Of course he would.

So how do you think Bashie’s Iranian and Hezbollah buddies would react to that, especially when the Assad regime is eventually about to topple?

I don’t believe it to be out of the realm of possibility that Tehran and/or Hezbollah would cut loose some sleeper cells right here in the good ol’ US of A. Or even if Assad acts unilaterally.

Surely, the ObaMessiah’s got to know this. And if anyone doesn’t believe the Syrian regime doesn’t have their own mischief-makers right here in America, I’ve got *ahem* a legitimate Hawaiian birth certificate I’d like to sell you.

But I Digress for the Last Time…

Keep in mind that we developed the M388 Davy Crockett nuclear weapons platform well over half a century ago (see video). The warhead proper was only the size of a volleyball, and that was from technology that’s considered positively Stone Age now.

Before I forget, the M388 nuclear device had 1/10th of the destructive power of the weapons that devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That’s just one of them.

But I Digress for the Last Time (Seriously)…

While we’re at it, forget about the Benghazi Hearings going anywhere. That topic is as dead as the four Americans killed by those al-Qaeda allied nasties last year.

Why? Simple. More than a few (including myself) were of the opinion Stevens was involved in a conspiracy to negotiate with al-Qaeda for American weapons to be shipped to their fellow Great Satan-hating playmates in Syria.

So why in the world should anyone be shocked or enraged if Stevens was covertly playing footsie with the same terrorists who butchered 3,000 Americans on 9/11?

Obama is now quite up-front and open about it. Nothing to see here. Keep moving along.


T. Kevin Whiteman

T. Kevin Whiteman

T. Kevin Whiteman is a retired Master Sergeant of Marines. He is the founder of the blog Unapologetically Rude and has written for Examiner and other blogs.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments