WaPo denies media bias in Gosnell case blackout, but wait till you hear why

WaPo denies media bias in Gosnell case blackout, but wait till you hear why

Gosnell Trial Media Bias“Is media bias to blame for lack of Gosnell coverage? Or something far more banal?” Those questions form the title of a piece in Sunday’s Washington Post that notes that despite the trial’s having all the ingredients of a must-report news event (“shocking allegations, horrifying visuals, sympathetic victims”), the media have been MIA.

These details prompt the article’s author, Paul Fahri, to ask again:

Could it be, as conservative bloggers have charged since shortly after the trial began March 18, that the media had taken a pass because Gosnell — who stands accused of killing seven newborn infants and one mother — is an abortion doctor whose alleged crimes run counter to the mainstream media’s supposed support for abortion rights?

Fahri’s answer, unsurprisingly, is no. But his arguments in support of that claim are not just surprising — they are shocking in their naiveté. Among the rationales he ascribes to unnamed “media representatives” are that “other stories were commanding” news organizations’ “attention and resources” and that “the lack of cameras in the courtroom diminished TV interest in the story.”

Then he offers this gem: “The Gosnell trial was simply overlooked.” Later in the article Fahri quotes The Post’s own executive editor Martin Baron, who admits “he wasn’t aware of the story until Thursday night, when readers began e-mailing him about it,” adding, “I wish I could be conscious of all stories everywhere, but I can’t be. Nor can any of us.”

Not since “My dog ate my homework” was first hazarded as an excuse has there been a less serious explanation for an omission — and this from a newspaper with a circulation of half a million.

But there’s more. Fahri goes on to catalog the responses of spokespeople for two of the major broadcast television networks (ABC declined comment), as well as CNN, MSNBC. Here’s NBC’s response in its entirety, “The story is on our radar. We understand the importance of the issue and we’ll continue to cover the broader questions as news warrants.”

A representative for CBS said that the network “has been working the story” but refused to explain why CBS hadn’t reported on it until Sunday’s “CBS Evening News.”

CNN, which Fahri reports “had aired only 76 words on the trial when host Jake Tapper mentioned it March 28,” called their coverage “thorough and appropriate,” and MSNBC said, “We don’t cover criminal trials to the extent of others in cable news.”

Related Articles

 Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook.


Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.

Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments