CNN anchor: ‘Is accepting some anti-Semitism needed for change in Mid-East?’

Samira tactics

Or how about “anti-female”?

Into each life some rain must fall. Replace “rain” with “anti-Semitism” and you have the gist of an outrageous question posed by CNN’s Erin Burnett to former first lady Laura Bush on Monday.

My Newsbusters colleague, Noel Sheppard, sets the stage:

In a segment about the George W. Bush Institute’s Women’s Initiative Fellowship Program and its involvement with a group of Egyptian women, Burnett asked Mrs. Bush if the United States needs to ‘accept’ anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism ‘when we want to make change.’

The question came up in the context of “human rights activist” Samira Ibraham (a pox on her!), who was all set to receive an International Women of Courage Award (to be presented by current first lady Michelle Obama) when it was revealed she had tweeted anti-Semitic and anti-American comments.

The thought of honoring a dyed-in-the-wool bigot should be revolting to any rational being, even if it is a means to a desirable end — in this case improved relations between the U.S. and the Middle East. Nevertheless, Burnett “went there.”

As a side note it should be pointed out that Burnett’s claim that Ibrahim has “done a lot of things, courageous things” needs to be viewed in the light of one of the most recent “things she has done,” which was initially to deny having sent the tweets — a position she later backed away from, deciding that the award was sour grapes.

To fully appreciate the odiousness of Burnett’s question, liberals are advised to substitute “anti-Semitic” with “anti-African American” or “anti-gay.”

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 12:32 PM

2 comments

  1. Well Howard…it’s a cruel question and answer but having lived in other countries, I am convinced that we in the US do not see both sides of a very old and difficult conflict (that I don’t think will ever be solved btw…Barry Goldwater nailed it a long time ago but that particular quote has disappeared from the internet). Perhaps we need this type of discussion to bring us into some balance. Just my opinion (the only thing I am an expert on).

  2. Pingback: Liberal bias finds its way into editorial on murder of black, gay pol | Liberty Unyielding

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>