Crybaby: Piers Morgan whines about criticism after criticizing gun advocates

Should he stay or should he go now?

Just like the typical schoolyard bully, CNN propagandist Piers Morgan proved that he can dish it out, but can’t take it.

“Fascinating to see how U.S. right wing masses as one to target anyone who disagrees with them on guns,” he whined on Twitter after being thoroughly schooled by Breitbart editor Ben Shapiro.

Like most on the far left, Morgan believes that people who debate him on the issue, or those who disagree with him are “threatening” him.

“But they can abuse/ridicule/threaten me all they like, I couldn’t give a damn. America needs better gun control – and needs it fast,” he tweeted.

“So, to challenge and debate someone is to ‘abuse/ridicule/threaten’ them? I get it!” one person responded.

“Fascinatingly,” Twitchy said, “the right-wing masses weren’t feeling sorry for him.”

Twitchy then posted a number of responses from conservatives on Twitter.

It’s equally fascinating to see how much you like to dish it out but can’t take it when confronted by an adult. English Geraldo @piersmorgan

— Moira Fitzgerald (@Moira1987) January 11, 2013

Since the Newtown shooting, Morgan, like much of the Democrat-media complex, has engaged in an all-out campaign to demonize and marginalize law-abiding gun owners and those who believe in the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Morgan now whines about the criticism he is facing, but conveniently forgot his own actions.

In December, for example, Morgan called NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre a “dangerous, dim-witted, deluded menace to American safety” in a tweet following LaPierre’s appearance on “Meet the Press.”

Morgan also called the NRA agenda “murderous” and appeared to encourage violence against the 4 million members of the pro-gun group in another tweet, and he has personally insulted gun advocates who appear on his own program.

“This is your moment, America: The #NRA has 4 million members, your population is 311 million. Don’t stand for this murderous c**p any more,” he tweeted.

After a heated discussion with Alex Jones, Morgan and his guests had a good laugh over the idea of shooting Jones with a semi-automatic weapon. So much for liberal “civility.”

The UK Daily Mail reported on Wednesday that Morgan “criticised the U.S. gun lobby as ‘stupid and dangerous’ for suggesting that more firearms could reduce crime – and said he doesn’t care if his opinions make him unpopular.”

Morgan also told the BBC that he was “unphased by the ‘vitriol’” from those who support the right to keep and bear arms.

But Morgan now sees fit to “run to Mommy” crying like a baby because his ‘widdle feewings’ are being hurt by conservatives who have “had it up to here” with him and those like him.

John Nolte wrote at Breitbart that Morgan is not the only one lashing out after Thursday’s debate with Shapiro.

What’s especially funny about this is that, after 15 hours and a full night to sleep on it, the entire CNN media-complex still can’t come up with an intellectually honest rebuttal to the points Shapiro made last night. So rather than accept defeat like adults, CNN senior producers choose to start publicly hurling non sequiturs covered in mud.

“Is this really the kind of shop Jeff Zucker, the newly installed head of CNN, wants to run? Is this the ‘new’ CNN: A bunch of unprofessional crybabies who pose as objective journalists have a bad night and then start hurling rocks after the invited guest has turned his back?” Nolte asked.

Morgan has a right to state his opinion. He does not, however, have a right to be free from criticism simply because he works at CNN.

Related Articles

If you like this article, you can follow Joe on Twitter @jnewby1956, or visit and join his Facebook page.

Friday, January 11, 2013 at 5:05 PM

0 comments

    • living in Wisconsin, we have a lot of cheese…unfortunately I am getting used to dealing with “whine” (seems we vote on a recall election about every 6 months…).

  1. I’ve never seen anyone ask Mr. Morgan about all the European handguns e.g. Glock, that they sell to the American cash export market but deny to their own citizens. We once banned cheap “Saturday night Specials.” Austria’s Glock is now the replacement, and is the weapon of choice for the bulk of homicides in the hood. How about going back to Europe, where you have some influence, and see wht you can do about the small weapons arms trade, Mr. Krupp, er Morgan? Yes, I know that it would be difficult talking the Germans, Swiss, and Italians out of a profitable niche they have carved out, in blood, here in the colonies, but you’ld be ever so much more helpful pissing on the fire in your own backyard rather than crapping on my porch and wiping your azz with our constitution.

    Steven

  2. In general, I expect a lot more whining from the “Morgans” mainly because the entire gun/rifle issue is — typically for complaints from the left — more complex than they make it out to be.

    • the whole gun debate is according to the master plan darwoh…take the top layer of dust and consider it clean rather than expose the rot driven by trying to pretend that mentally ill people can function in society.

      it is certainly a much more complex problem…but Pledge is cheap and easy to use (and has a nice lemon scent).

      • It’s not just mentally ill people that are the problem, kjeet. There are also people with malevolent intent who obtain their weapons illegally. No amount of speechifying or legislation is going to fix this problem.

        Oh, and not to nitpick, but it is Lemon Pledge that has the nice lemon scent. Regular Pledge stinks.

        • Speechifying and legislation won’t fix it, but an armed citizenry can turn those cowards with malevolent intentions into victims fertilizer.

          • I believe the bulk of the cowards with malevolent intentions reside in cities that severely restrict the ability to form an armed citizenry. Just a coincidence I’m sure.

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>