Yesterday, a federal appeals court in St. Louis blocked the Biden administration’s attempt to illegally write off billions of dollars in student loan debt — such as allowing certain borrowers to have their debt forgiven after ten years:
The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a request by seven Republican-led states to put on hold parts of the U.S. Department of Education’s debt relief plan that had not already been blocked by a lower-court judge.
That ruling last month by U.S. District Judge John Ross in St. Louis had blocked the department from granting further loan forgiveness under the administration’s Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan but had not blocked all of the plan….State attorneys general led by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey subsequently last week asked the 8th Circuit to block the rest of the SAVE Plan. The court did so through a one-page order granting an administrative stay.
Bailey on the social platform X hailed the ruling as a “huge win for every American who still believes in paying their own way.” He said the student loan plan “would have saddled working Americans with half-a-trillion dollars in Ivy League debt.”
An April 2024 report by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates Biden’s student loan bailouts, put together, “will cost a combined $870 billion to $1.4 trillion.”
After the Supreme Court ruled last year that Biden’s attempt to cancel $500 billion in student loan debt was illegal, Biden canceled some of the same debt using new excuses, writing off billions more in student loans. In April, 17 states sued the Biden administration over its new plans to cancel student loans, arguing that Biden’s new plan was illegal, too.
Canceling student loans is a bad idea. It encourages colleges to jack up tuition, by making it more attractive to take out big loans to cover college tuition. When students are willing to borrow more to go to college, colleges respond by raising tuition. The Daily Caller notes that “each additional dollar in government financial aid translated to a tuition hike of about 65 cents,” according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Canceling student loan debt is “regressive and unfair,” says Katherine Abraham, a former adviser to Obama who served as Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics during the Clinton administration. As Greg Price points out, “Only 37% of Americans have a 4-yr college degree, only 13% have graduate degrees, and a full 56% of student loan debt is held by people who went to grad school. Biden’s plan to cancel it would be like taking money from a plumber to pay the debt of a lawyer.” Even the liberal Washington Post called Biden’s student-loan bailout “a regressive, expensive mistake.”
Student loan forgiveness also is inflationary. Jason Furman, chairman of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, called Biden’s plan to cancel student loans “reckless.” Furman said, “Pouring roughly half trillion dollars of gasoline on the inflationary fire that is already burning is reckless.” Biden’s student loan forgiveness will increase inflation, inequality, tuition, and the national debt.
The Wall Street Journal criticized Biden’s new plan to write off student loans after the Supreme Court ruled against his old plan, arguing that the new plan “will encourage colleges to raise costs, especially in graduate programs for which there are no federal loan limits. Who cares if students can’t repay? They will be forgiven one way or another.”
The Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against Biden’s earlier loan-forgiveness plan was expected by most observers. Some of them accused Biden of currying favor with young voters by promising student loan forgiveness that he knew was illegal and would be struck down, thus giving them false hope. Biden sought to deny this, saying “I didn’t give any false hope. The Republicans snatched away the hope that they were given.”
But that was dishonest on Biden’s part. Earlier, he himself had admitted he lacked the power to forgive student loans en masse. The president said of student loan cancellation during a 2021 CNN town hall, “I don’t think I have the authority to do it by signing with a pen.”
Other Democratic Party leaders used to admit that Biden lacks the power to forgive student loans, the very ones denouncing today’s Supreme Court decision. On July 28, 2021, “then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi explained: ‘People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress.”
As journalist Charles Cooke noted in 2023, “Biden knew this was illegal. Everyone knew this was illegal. That he tried to do it anyway, in violation of his oath of office, remains a monumental disgrace.”
