By Peter Hasson
The New York Times on Tuesday night badly butchered a story on a forthcoming executive order from President Donald Trump addressing anti-Semitism on college campuses.
The story, which quickly went viral on Twitter alleged that Trump was redefining Jewish-Americans as a separate nationality, leading some Trump critics to draw comparisons between the president and Hitler. “It smacks not only of what happened in the Soviet Union but also Nazi Germany,” Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal said on CNN Wednesday morning.
“Mr. Trump’s order will have the effect of embracing an argument that Jews are a people or a race with a collective national origin in the Middle East, like Italian Americans or Polish Americans,” the paper claimed in its story. But that was inaccurate.
Trending: Cartoon of the Day: The fine print
What the order does do is ensure anti-Semitism is covered by Title VI civil rights protections, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin at federally funded institutions, such as universities. “Discrimination against Jews may give rise to a Title VI violation when the discrimination is based on an individual’s race, color, or national origin,” reads a leaked version of the order, which Trump is expected to sign on Wednesday.
Tablet Magazine writer Yair Rosenberg noted that “the underlying rule here is an Obama-era distinction that protects Jews as a ‘nationality and race’ *not* because we Jews all see ourselves that way, but because RACISTS do, and the law needs to fight them when they do that.”
“Unless the administration changed the executive order on anti-Semitism at the last minute, it seems like we had a national Twitter freakout yesterday over bad reporting,” added Rosenberg.
The paper’s misleading story drew criticism not just from conservatives but also from writers on the left.
“The order’s interpretation of Title VI — insofar as the law applies to Jews — is entirely in line with the Obama administration’s approach,” noted liberal Slate writer Mark Stern, who concluded that “The New York Times absolutely blew this story.”
The Times didn’t immediately return a request for comment.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.