“We’re going to go a lot higher.” So said President Trump this morning in reference to a report that showed a 4.1% rise in gross domestic product during the second quarter. “It was the highest quarterly jump in nearly four years,” writes CNBC.
So how are the “experts” taking the news? Well, Princeton economist Paul Krugman could not be reached for comment, though we did manage to scare up his predictions from election night in 2016:
It really does now look like President Donald J. Trump, and markets are plunging. When might we expect them to recover?
Frankly, I find it hard to care much, even though this is my specialty. The disaster for America and the world has so many aspects that the economic ramifications are way down my list of things to fear.
Trending: Dem activist drafts a petition to ban Trump rallies
Still, I guess people want an answer: If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.
Under any circumstances, putting an irresponsible, ignorant man who takes his advice from all the wrong people in charge of the nation with the world’s most important economy would be very bad news. What makes it especially bad right now, however, is the fundamentally fragile state much of the world is still in, eight years after the great financial crisis. [Emphasis added]
To some, the highlighted passage probably sounded more like a description of the outgoing president than the incoming one, but how can you argue with an “expert” like Krugman?
Or Lawrence Summers, Treasury secretary under Obama and former Harvard University president. On March 30, 2017, Summers was a guest on CNBC’s “Squawk Box Live, where he addressed Trump’s announced GDP target, asserting there’s “no data suggesting we’re moving toward 3-4% growth”:
Finally, there’s Michael Hiltzik, whose financial columns in the Los Angeles Times earned him a Pulitzer Prize. His column from May 19, 2017 was headlined “If Trump thinks he can get more than 3% economic growth, he’s dreaming.” Here are the opening paragraphs:
With the political world deeply focused on the question of whether the Trump administration comprises a gang of Russian pawns, less attention has been devoted to more mundane questions, such as what ever happened to Trump’s economic policy?
As it happens, economists are keeping their eye on that ball, and their conclusion is that it’s in a bad way. More specifically, they recognize that Trump’s policy is aimed heavily at achieving annual economic growth of more than 3%.
During the presidential campaign, Trump promised growth of 3.5% a year, and sometimes even 4%. There’s no disagreement that a sustained growth rate of this magnitude would be a significant achievement. Over the past decade, the economy has grown at an average of about 2% a year. The Congressional Budget Office forecasts an annual average of about 1.9% well into the next decade.
Yeah, well, as we learned from the polls leading up to the 2016 election, predictions can be wrong.
