CNN reveals shocking role of Trump adviser in 2016 hunt for Clinton emails on dark web

CNN reveals shocking role of Trump adviser in 2016 hunt for Clinton emails on dark web
(Image: Shutterstock)

Finally, a smoking gun.

We’ve been waiting a long time for this.  It seems like no one has been able to make anything stick against the shady Trump team.  No matter how carefully an innuendo case is built against them, the big fish keep swimming away scot-free.

That ends now.  CNN has Joseph Schmitz dead to rights.  In 2016, while a named member of Trump’s foreign policy team, Schmitz thought he had a lead on Hillary Clinton emails being offered on the dark web.  And you may want to sit down before learning what he did about it.

CNN:

Trending: Honduran woman who scaled border wall to give birth in U.S. complains she was treated like criminal

A Donald Trump foreign policy adviser pushed government agencies to review materials from the dark web in the summer of 2016 that he thought were Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails, multiple sources with direct knowledge tell CNN.

Joseph Schmitz approached the FBI and other government agencies about material a client of his had discovered that Schmitz believed might have been Clinton’s missing 30,000 emails from her private e-mail server, sources say. The material was never verified, and sources say they ultimately believed it was fake.

Pushed.  Pushed, I tell you!  Schmitz approached the FBI.

Could anything be more nefariously obsessive and anti-Hillary?

CNN provides context:

His push is the latest example of Trump advisers who were mixed up in efforts to find dirt on Clinton during the presidential campaign.

There are 170 more words about Trump advisers and their mix-ups with dirt (just memorize it already: Trump, mixed up, dirt) before we get to the point that Joseph Schmitz is a former Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Defense, whose only approaches with the potential Hillary material were to the FBI, the State Department, the Intelligence Community Inspector General, and the House Intelligence Committee.

This suggests that the CNN headline for this story, captured for posterity, comes perilously close to being in the nature of a smear.

(Screen cap; original annotation [red labels] by CNN; side annotation by author)
But it also suggests that Schmitz, a person with background and experience, may have had legitimate reasons for thinking he was onto something.

Remember, this was the Obama-era FBI, State Department, and Intelligence Community Inspector General he was approaching.  Hillary got an “HQ special” from at least the first two of them on her email security breaches.

There’s no word on what the House Intelligence Committee thought of the material.  (Schmitz apparently received the lead on it from a client.  He works at a law firm now.)

There’s always the chance that Schmitz is just a conscientious former public servant who wanted to ensure he touched all the bases before dropping the matter himself.  That would be characteristic of IGs.  It’s quite possible he didn’t actually push anything, in the sense of insisting, against advice, that there was more there.

It does make you wonder if we’re about to hear that the emails Schmitz notified federal agencies about have turned up.  It’s not clear why this story would be deployed just now.

But it is clear that CNN has beclowned itself again.  An honest headline for this story would read:

Former Pentagon IG tipped FBI to possible Hillary emails on dark web; feds discounted lead

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using either the Spot.IM commenting system or the Facebook commenting system. If Spot.IM is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.

J.E. Dyer

J.E. Dyer

J.E. Dyer is a retired Naval Intelligence officer who lives in Southern California, blogging as The Optimistic Conservative for domestic tranquility and world peace. Her articles have appeared at Hot Air, Commentary’s Contentions, Patheos, The Daily Caller, The Jewish Press, and The Weekly Standard.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.