The Electoral College is a national security threat? One liberal outlet thinks so

The Electoral College is a national security threat? One liberal outlet thinks so

There are many things that can be said about the American electoral college system, but calling it a threat to national security? That’s what Politico Magazine is now arguing.

In a lengthy and emotionally charged diatribe co-authored by a counter-terrorism expert and a former Army intelligence officer, the left-leaning magazine insists that the Electoral College should be abolished because it provides foreign nations with the opportunity to influence the outcomes of U.S. presidential elections. (Hmm, which election could they possibly have in mind?)

The authors uses Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 68 to explain the Founding Fathers’s theory that the U.S. electoral college would protect the nation from “the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.”

The essay further argues that Hamilton and the other forefathers could not have imagined, or prepared for, an election like 2016, thereby bolstering the claim that Russia “was able to manipulate America’s election process with stunning effectiveness.”

Trending: Biden daughter’s diary spoke of being sexualized at young age, taking ‘inappropriate’ showers with Joe Biden

“But it’s clear the national security rationale for the Electoral College is outdated and therefore it should be retired,” opine authors Matthew Olsen and Benjamin Haas. ” Simply put, it enables foreign powers to more easily pierce the very shield Hamilton imagined it would be.”

After doing away with the electoral college, the pair continues, the nation would be better off moving toward a system where the U.S. elects presidents based on the national popular vote:

No voter would be more electorally powerful than another. It would be more difficult for a foreign entity to sway many millions of voters scattered across the country than concentrated groups of tens of thousands of voters in just a few states. And it would be more difficult to tamper with voting systems on a nationwide basis than to hack into a handful of databases in crucial swing districts, which could alter an election’s outcome.

The authors throw out the possibility of creating some sort of task force or media platform to publicly call out and identify “the false narratives that adversaries push through fake news stories.” Once again, this critique seems squarely aimed at conservative media.

They also suggest that the U.S. put more pressure on social media websites, like Facebook, to ensure they “identify and block fake accounts and bogus ad campaigns designed to tilt our elections.”

Whether or not these other measures are enacted, “ending the Electoral College should be central to the discussion.”

The piece never addresses the problem of representation in a national election in the event the Electoral College were to be scrapped. States with small populations, like Wyoming and Montana, would be off the radar of any candidate since they offer few votes. There would be no impetus for citizens of those states to cast their ballots because their will would be drowned out by larger states such as California, Illinois, and New York.

Perhaps it is only a coincidence, but such an arrangement would favor the Democrats, who maintain strongholds in those states.

This report, by Robert Donachie, was cross posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.