More lessons on what is and what isn’t sexist from the MSM and a U.S. corporation

More lessons on what is and what isn’t sexist from the MSM and a U.S. corporation
President Trump meeting the wife of French President Macron (Image: YouTube screen grab via Washington Post)

We all know that objectifying women is a no-no, unless you happen to be a liberal, in which case have at it. When Barack Obama told Democratic leaders at a fundraiser in 2013 that then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris was “by far, the best looking attorney general in the country,” the crowd started laughing.

True, some in the Donk community found the comment sexist, among them kingmaker James Carville, who said on MSNBC:

Look, I’m a 68-year-old guy and I do notice honestly the way that women look sometimes, but you’ve got to learn to sort of keep your opinions to yourself.

But the remark had plenty of defenders. Jonathan Capehart of The Washington Post wrote, “Lighten up, people. You’d swear the president was guilty of luridly cat-calling a woman he doesn’t know.” Politico’s media reporter Dylan Byers, meanwhile, asked in a tweet:

Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?

Eventually, Obama phoned Harris to apologize for this “thoughtlessness”(!), but otherwise the matter was forgotten.

Not so, an equally innocent compliment delivered last week to Brigitte Macron, wife of French President Emanuel Macron, but that’s because the speaker was Donald Trump.

Admittedly, Trump’s remark — “You’re in such good shape. She’s in such good physical shape. Beautiful” — was a tad clunky and rough around the edges, but that’s the way he speaks. Who among us isn’t used to it by now?

I’ll tell you who. CNN, The New York Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post, and just about every other voice in the mainstream media weighed in on this crucial story.

But that’s not all. Corporate America wants you to know that it knows that the president’s remark confirms what a sexist pig and (probably) womanizer he is. Here’s athletic shoe manufacturer Reebok:

The flowchart appears to be missing a few elements. Another box with “Yes” in it should appear at the top chart and ask the question “Are you a seller of athletic ware with $2 billion in sales?” At the bottom of the diagram, another “Yes” box should be added that asks the question “Are you a giant hypocrite?”

To illustrate what I mean, consider this 30-second commercial the company released in February:

Or check out one of its billboards:

Reebok, in other words, doesn’t walk the walk. That’s because sex sells.

The company owes the president an apology. So do the media.

(h/t Conservative Tree House)

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy

Howard Portnoy has written for The Blaze, HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.