Tweet of the Day: Tree-huggers at Berkeley get naked with trees

Tweet of the Day: Tree-huggers at Berkeley get naked with trees

When in doubt about the soundness of your protest, take all your clothes off. That seems to be an unwritten rule of twenty-first-century liberal activism.

It was exercised by tree-huggers at the University of California at Berkeley, who got naked Saturday, which somehow is meant to show their love for nearby trees that authorities are planning to cut own and, presumably, stay the ax.

About 50 people showed up at a grove of eucalyptus trees on the campus of UC-Berkeley, stripped off their clothes, and began to interact intimately with the trees in the grove for the benefit of photographer Jack Gescheidt.

The nudity was organized by Gescheidt as part of his Tree Spirit Project, an effort to create fine art photographs by, well, taking pictures of naked people while they cavort about in nature. The project’s website describes it as an attempt to “raise awareness of the critical role trees play in our lives, both globally and pesonally [sic].”

The Berkeley photo shoot was held as a protest of a plan by authorities in Oakland, UC-Berkeley, and the East Bay Regional Park District to cut down thousands of trees in the area. The plan, which has FEMA approval and could start by the end of August, is allegedly needed for both fire prevention and to check the spread of the invasive eucalyptus tree. Wildfires are no petty concern for the area. In 1991, a firestorm tore through Oakland and Berkeley, torching over 1,500 acres of land along with 2,800 homes. Twenty-five people were killed.

The initiative has local environmental groups feuding. The local Claremont Canyon Conservancy thinks the plan should go farther, both for the sake of preventing fires and to protect local wildlife from the invasive eucalyptus. They say the eucalyptus was particularly to blame for the fire because of its heavy production of bark and leaves which create substantial fuel for a blaze.

But the naked protesters claim the Conservancy has it all wrong, and that cutting trees down will only increase the fire hazard. Protester Ken Cheetham told the Daily Californian that the cutting plan was “extremely misinformed” because living eucalyptus trees hinder fire by collecting moisture. Cheetham also dismissed concerns about invasive species, saying different lifeforms “can find ways to adapt to each other.”

One supposes the fact that he and his naked pals haven’t been arrested is proof.

This report, by Blake Neff, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.


LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.