Obama: Global warming gave my daughter asthma

Obama: Global warming gave my daughter asthma
Barack Obama and his daughter Malia

Doubling down on his campaign to tie global warming to respiratory illness, President Obama told ABC’s “Good Morning America” that global warming gave his daughter, Malia, asthma when she was a toddler.

Scary stuff, but there’s just one problem for Obama: Comments a couple years ago made by his wife his wife suggest that being in a crowded circus with lots of dust and particles in the air triggered their daughter’s asthma, not global warming. Their daughter also has a peanut allergy, and circuses are usually teaming with peanuts.

Despite that glaring fact, Obama continued to use his daughter’s asthma to further political ends.

“You worry the environment, the climate, has impacted on your own daughter,” Dr. Richard Besser, ABC’s chief health and medical editor, asked Obama in an interview the day after the White House launched a renewed effort to tie asthma to global warming.

“Well, you know Malia had asthma when she was 4 and because we had good health insurance, we were able to knock it out early,” Obama told Besser.

What I can relate to is the fear a parent has when your four-year-old daughter comes up to you and says, ‘Daddy, I’m having trouble breathing.’ The fright you feel is terrible. And if we can make sure that our responses to the environment are reducing those incidents, that’s something that I think every parent would wish for.

Obama then said that when he went to Occidental College in Los Angeles in 1979 he could feel his lungs burn after about five minutes of running outside because the air pollution was so bad.

“We took steps to deal with it, and today, it’s not perfect, but it’s a whole lot better,” Obama said of LA’s air pollution. “And the same thing is true with climate change.”

On Tuesday the White House launched a campaign to illustrate the effects global warming will have on public health, in particular the White House said that global temperature rises will make asthma worse for kids across the country.

But Obama’s “worry” that global warming gave his daughter asthma may be overblown. In 2012, Michelle Obama claimed their daughter got asthma around the same time while at the circus, saying the family had to make sure their house was “dust- and dander-free, and don’t bring in anything that will disrupt her.”

The Obama family even got a hypoallergenic dog, after Barack became president, so it wouldn’t trigger Malia’s asthma.

“In the past three decades, the percentage of Americans with asthma has more than doubled, and climate change is putting these individuals and many other vulnerable populations at greater risk of landing in the hospital,” the White House said in a fact sheet.

The problem is that White House claims that global warming is exacerbating asthma are lacking in evidence. For starters, the basic argument that warming will make asthma worse — mainly through increased episodes of extreme heat, ground-level ozone and smoke from wildfires — lacks support.

Asthma prevalence has increased in the U.S. while major air pollutants like ozone, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide have fallen dramatically, according to government data.

A study by Johns Hopkins Children’s Center published in January also threw a wrench into Obama’s asthma claims. The study found there is no link between air pollution and childhood asthma.

Rather than air pollution, researchers found that poverty was a greater predictor of asthma rates — a major departure from science the EPA says backs up strict regulations on air pollutants.

Dr. Corinne Keet, a pediatric allergy and asthma specialist at Johns Hopkins and the study’s lead researcher, said in a statement:

Our results highlight the changing face of pediatric asthma and suggest that living in an urban area is, by itself, not a risk factor for asthma. Instead, we see that poverty and being African American or Puerto Rican are the most potent predictors of asthma risk.

But tying global warming to personal health worries has been part of the EPA’s strategy since 2009 when the agency hired political strategists to develop a messaging strategy to tackle the issue. An EPA memo from March 2009, obtained by Competitive Enterprise Institute senior fellow Chris Horner through a Freedom of Information Act request, asserted:

Polar ice caps and the polar bears have become the climate change ‘mascots,’ if you will, and personify the challenges we have in making this issue real for many Americans.

Most Americans will never see a polar ice cap, nor will most have the chance to see a polar bear in its natural habitat. Therefore, it is easy to detach from the seriousness of this issue. Unfortunately, climate change in the abstract is an increasingly — and consistently — unpersuasive argument to make.

By revitalizing our own Children’s Health Office, leading the global charge on this issue, and highlighting the children’s health dimension to all of our major initiatives — we will also make this issue real for many Americans who otherwise would oppose many of our regulatory actions.

This report, by Michael Bastasch, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using either the Spot.IM commenting system or the Facebook commenting system. If Spot.IM is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.