Good thing the military doesn’t have a rigid code that service members either follow lockstep or pack their bags. Oh, wait…
In April, I reported on a decision by the military to ban multiple braids, twists, and dreadlocks and to limit cornrows to no more than a quarter of an inch. Army Regulation 670-1 had been amended to read:
Hairstyles (including bulk and length of hair) that do not allow Soldiers to wear the headgear properly, or that interfere with the proper wear of the protective mask or other protective equipment, are prohibited. Headgear will fit snugly and comfortably, without bulging or distortion from the intended shape of the headgear and without excessive gaps.
Headgear, schmedgear. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has relaxed the requirements after complaints from black service members who accused the military of racial bias. According to Military Times, Hagel delivered a letter to lawmakers on Capitol Hill Monday notifying them of the changes. In the letter, he explained:
Each service reviewed its hairstyle policies to ensure standards are fair and respectful while also meeting military requirements. These reviews were informed by a panel of military personnel of mixed demographics reflective of our diverse force.
Three services — the Army, Navy, and Air Force — have authorized additional hair styles, Hagel said. There is no mention of headgear or any other practical considerations that might be affected by the reversal.
In the meantime, it’s nice to know that the Defense Secretary is flexible. Here’s hoping he’s not quite as malleable should a fighting unit ever decide to defy an order because it hurts their feelings.
Related Articles
- New Army hairstyles prompt allegations of racism from black enlistees
- Michigan: Yet another campus ‘racism’ attack turns out to be a hoax
- To fight racism, college plans happy hour that excludes whites
- Fun with progressive racism: 8 policy examples
- The ‘racism’ wrecking ball
- Inspiring video of people speaking out in the face of racism
- Why the left needs racism–III
- Who’s ready to desegregate organized sports in favor of white athletes?
- Columbia University seeks to change ‘white only’ requirement for fellowship
- Turns out there’s a ‘White Privilege Conference.’ Yes, it’s taxpayer-funded
- U. of Minnesota Black Student Union: Stop mentioning race in crime alerts
- Common Core: ‘Educating’ 4th-graders about ‘white privilege’
- The conversation on race people us people of white privilege should have with our kids
- Report: Affirmative action has made ‘white privilege’ worse