
What a compassionate guy the nation’s top cop is! Who but Eric Holder would lament that felons are being denied “what’s been called the ‘most basic right’ of American citizenship”?
CNSNews provides a video of remarks Attorney General made at a criminal justice forum at Georgetown University Law Center:
In many states, felony disenfranchisement laws are still on the books. And the current scope of these policies is not only too significant to ignore — it is also too unjust to tolerate.
[…]
These laws deserve to be not only reconsidered, but repealed.
So is shorter AG “I heart ex-cons”? Nope. It’s not that the chief law enforcement officer has a soft spot for criminals. Rather his concern (once again!) is for “his people.” In his spiel, he notes that 38% of the 5.8 million Americans who can’t vote because of current or previous felony convictions are black.
Although well over a century has passed since post-Reconstruction states used these measures to strip African Americans of their most fundamental rights, the impact of felony disenfranchisement on modern communities of color remains both disproportionate and unacceptable.
[…]
Whenever we tell citizens who have paid their debts and rejoined their communities that they are not entitled to take part in the democratic process, we fall short of the bedrock promise — of equal opportunity and equal justice — that has always served as the foundation of our legal system. So it’s time to renew our commitment — here and now — to the notion that the free exercise of our fundamental rights should never be subject to politics, or geography, or the lingering effects of flawed and unjust policies.
A problem with Holder’s sob story is the high recidivism rate among blacks. Within 3 years of their release, almost 7 out of 10 black males go back to prison. Consider also the sorts of people who influence their life choices and beliefs while they’re incarcerated. It’s not as though they are being molded into conscientious and responsible members of society during their time in stir.
Maybe one of the reasons Holder militates in favor of extending the vote to ex-cons is that he anticipates a stint of his own in the big house some time in his future.
Related Articles
- Eric Holder shakes down ‘racist’ lenders to tune of $1 billion
- Is Eric Holder making up gay marriage law as he goes along?
- State’s rights, shmate’s rights, says Eric Holder (once again)
- Articles of impeachment introduced against Attorney General Eric Holder
- House introduces articles of impeachment against Eric Holder
- Effort underway in House to get Eric Holder impeached
- Salon writer asks If Eric Holder Is Obama’s ‘Inner N**ger’
- Eric Holder launches ‘snitch line’ on Zimmerman
- What Eric Holder told his son about Trayvon
- What Happened to Eric Holder?
- Eric Holder vs. the media: What is ‘off the record’?
- Michael Eric Dyson: Attorney General Eric Holder ‘the Moses of our time’
- Kansas will go to court against Eric Holder to protect gun rights
- Eric Holder: Amnesty Is a ‘civil right’
- Liberals are ready to fire Eric Holder
- Eric Holder to stay on as AG as new evidence of his ‘jurisimprudence’ emerges