Epic fail: The $1 trillion pension funding gap you’ve never heard of

Epic fail: The $1 trillion pension funding gap you’ve never heard of

Taxpayers are on the hook for one of the biggest government failures they’ve probably never heard of — $1 trillion in unfunded pension liabilities for federal retirees.

Massive unfunded pension liabilities at the local and state levels have made headlines in recent years, but rarely mentioned is the estimated $1 trillion funding gap in the world’s fourth-largest retirement system. Despite a law passed more than three decades ago requiring officials set aside sufficient funds to cover present and projected future benefits, federal personnel officials are partially subsidizing payments with transfers from the Department of Treasury instead of forcing agencies to come up with the cash on their own, according to a former U.S. Army auditor who has studied the issue closely.

“I’m looking at the taxpayers,” Tom McKinney, a retired certified internal auditor for the U.S. Army Audit Agency who writes about unfunded federal pensions for Truth in Accounting, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “The taxpayers are being hosed.” Truth in Accounting is a non-profit group advocating greater transparency and accuracy in government accounting.

Image: Truth In Accounting
Image: Truth In Accounting

Promised benefits from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, which has 2.6 million retirees and 2.7 million current federal employees, are only 48% funded. If it was a private sector system, retirement leaders would be legally required to have a rehabilitation strategy when it dropped below “critical” funding levels of 65%, McKinney said. But in an illustration of bureaucratic “%,” no such requirement is applied to the federal government, he said.

Federal law also requires participants and agencies fully fund pensions for people hired on or after July 1, 1984, but that clearly isn’t happening, McKinney said.

For years, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has been taking tax dollars from the U.S. Treasury to fund a growing gap in retirement payments, according to information McKinney received through a Freedom of Information Act request. The OPM funded $23 billion, or 28% of all payments in fiscal year 2015, in that manner.

OPM isn’t managing the $800 million currently in its retirement fund well either, McKinney said. OPM paid $430 million in retirement benefits to dead people from 2011 to 2014, according to an October 2015 report from the OPM Office of Inspector General.

The Government Accountability Office has tried to draw attention to the problem since 1997, but McKinney said the Treasury’s annual bailouts only incentivize the federal government to keep the pension system underfunded to continue receiving rescue money.

When McKinney first started investigating federal pension plan funding several years ago, fellow retired federal employees told him not to rock the boat, fearing for their own pensions. About 600 retired members of Congress receive retirement benefits from the fund, too.

“Federal employees don’t want to talk about it,” McKinney told TheDCNF. “Congressmen don’t want to talk about it.”

The federal government needs to take current pension laws seriously, or Congress should devise better ones, McKinney said. OPM also needs to follow private sector practices, ones that don’t include Treasury Department bailouts, he said.

“Taxpayers are paying for all this,” McKinney added. “And is it moral to have the working folks out here pay for pensions?”

This report, by Kathryn Watson, was cross-posted by arrangement with the Daily Caller News Foundation.

LU Staff

LU Staff

Promoting and defending liberty, as defined by the nation’s founders, requires both facts and philosophical thought, transcending all elements of our culture, from partisan politics to social issues, the workings of government, and entertainment and off-duty interests. Liberty Unyielding is committed to bringing together voices that will fuel the flame of liberty, with a dialogue that is lively and informative.


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

You may use HTML in your comments. Feel free to review the full list of allowed HTML here.