Scientist: WA state lockdown justified with ‘garbage data’; even Fauci warned against

Scientist: WA state lockdown justified with ‘garbage data’; even Fauci warned against
A coronavirus. CDC: Dr. Fred Murphy & Sylvia Whitfield

[Ed. – This is back to the cycle threshold for PCR testing. The scientist says every Washington State test — a benchmark because of the early detection and lockdown there — used a cycle threshold in the 37-39 range.]

“In May 2020, when it was becoming clear that the data’s garbage, we went back to living as normal as we possibly could,” he said. “My wife and I discussed that for the sake of our sanity … for our kids’ emotional sanity let’s just get back to normal. It’s not worth it.”

Knopik began prying information out of the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) to find out what the numbers revealed. …

“Never in my professional career [have I seen] this level of vagueness and corrupted data,” Knopik added. “It wouldn’t be stood for in private business or in a doctoral study. This is just amazing to me. The level of impactful decisions made on just garbage data – that’s what I’m calling it, garbage data – I’ve never seen anything like this.”

Trending: The key supporting effort appears to be underway on Trump’s operational timeline

[…]

[I]n July of 2020, none other than the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, himself said in an interview that anything over a 35 cycle rate was bogus.

“What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard,” Fauci said, is that “if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-[competent] are minuscule.”

Continue reading →

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.