There’s a reason no government has done a cost-benefit analysis on the lockdowns

There’s a reason no government has done a cost-benefit analysis on the lockdowns
New York City's Times Square is currently a ghost town.

[Ed. – Biden is now threatening a tighter lockdown in the event Americans don’t change their ways.]

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced last week that his state is ending its mask mandate and business capacity limits. While Democrats and many public-health officials denounced the move, ample data now exist to demonstrate that the benefits of stringent measures aren’t worth the costs.

This wasn’t always the case. A year ago I publicly advocated lockdowns because they seemed prudent given how little was known at the time about the virus and its effects. But locking society down has become the default option of governments all over the world, regardless of cost.

More than a year after the pandemic began, vaccination is under way in both Europe and the U.S. Yet stringent restrictions are still in place on both sides of the Atlantic. Germany, Ireland and the U.K. are still in lockdown. … In many U.S. states, in-person schooling is still rare.

Trending: Biden’s jumbling of letters in abbreviated names is a sign of two problems, both big

Continue reading →

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.