[Ed. – The plaintiffs sought an emergency injunction to prevent state certification of the vote, and the court denied that on Tuesday. But see Jenna Ellis tweet: the decision on whether to hear the case is still pending. It may be a long shot, but this is an extraordinary situation. I wouldn’t make assumptions about what the denial of injunctive relief means.]
Republican Senator Ted Cruz is responding to the Supreme Court unanimously ruling Tuesday it will not take up a case surrounding the constitutionality of votes cast through mail-in voting during the 2020 presidential election in Pennsylvania.
At the beginning of the week, Cruz vowed to argue the case at the Supreme Court if the justices agreed to hear it.
“Because of the importance of the legal issues presented, I’ve publicly urged #SCOTUS to hear the case brought by Congressman Mike Kelly, congressional candidate Sean Parnell & state rep. candidate Wanda Logan challenging the constitutionality of the POTUS election results in PA. …”
🚨IMPORTANT POINT REPORTERS ARE MISSING IN PA SUIT:
— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) December 8, 2020