Computer expert finds discrepancies in Michigan vote

Computer expert finds discrepancies in Michigan vote
High-value target. YouTube video; LU staff

[Ed. – Another statistically anomalous finding, this one based on a physical impossibility.  Read the whole article.]

Until about 2 A.M. election night, Trump was running ahead in Michigan, “generally winning between 55% and 60% of every turnout vote,” said Ramsland.  “Then after the counting was closed at 2 a.m., the situation dramatically reversed itself, starting with a series of impossible spikes shortly after counting was supposed to have stopped.”

Here’s Ramsland’s explanation: “The several spikes cast solely for Biden could easily be produced in the Dominion system by preloading batches of blank ballots in files such as Write-Ins, then casting them all for Biden using the Override Procedure … that is available to the operator of the system.”

“There were 289,866 more ballots processed in the time available for processing in four precincts/townships, than there was capacity,” said Ramsland.

Trending: Now that he has nothing to lose, Obama shares real opinion of Jeremiah Wright

In plain English, that means they counted almost 300,000 more ballots than physically possible.

“This is not surprising because the system is highly vulnerable to a manual change in the ballot totals as observed[,]” said Ramsland.

Continue reading →

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.