[Ed. – And yet the IG concluded the investigation itself was properly predicated. It took procedural violations and nine false statements to make a case for surveillance to the FISA court? No wonder John Durham has his doubts.]
To understand just how shoddy the FBI’s work was in securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant targeting the Trump campaign, you only need to read an obscure attachment to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report.
Appendix 1 identifies the total violations by the FBI of the so-called Woods Procedures, the process by which the bureau verifies information and assures the FISA court its evidence is true.
The Appendix identifies a total of 51 Woods procedure violations from the FISA application the FBI submitted to the court authorizing surveillance of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page starting in October 2016.
Trending: Cartoon of the Day: The fine print
A whopping nine of those violations fell into the category called: “Supporting document shows that the factual assertion is inaccurate.”