As lawyer arguing before SCOTUS, Ruth Bader Ginsberg received only so-so marks from one Justice

As lawyer arguing before SCOTUS, Ruth Bader Ginsberg received only so-so marks from one Justice
File; from an appearance in 2018.

[Ed. – So much for Notorious RBG.]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a revered Supreme Court justice who spent her early legal career fighting for women’s rights. But one justice gave her original performance before the high court only passing marks.

“Prof. Ruth Ginsburg. C-plus,” Justice Harry Blackmun wrote on loose-leaf paper during her first Supreme Court argument, Frontiero v. Laird, in January 1973. “Very precise. Female. Reads.”

Perhaps alone among his colleagues, Justice Blackmun made detailed assessments of Supreme Court advocates, grading them like law students and often noting their hometowns, law schools and even their ethnicities. Several of those attorneys later joined the Supreme Court.

Trending: Federal safety regulations kill thousands of people

One was Antonin Scalia. “Plump. Dark,” Justice Blackmun wrote, as the future jurist, then a Justice Department attorney, argued his only Supreme Court case, a January 1976 dispute involving Cuban cigar factories seized by the Castro regime. He got a grade of 85, equal to a B.

Continue reading →

Comments

For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.