Eighth Circuit rules Minnesota can’t compel videographers to work same-sex wedding

Eighth Circuit rules Minnesota can’t compel videographers to work same-sex wedding

[Ed. – We’ll see if this ruling is appealed.  The 8th Circuit ruling mirrors the SCOTUS ruling on the Masterpiece Cakeshop case (against Colorado); Minnesota (the defendant) doesn’t seem likely to win on appeal.  Boldface in original.]

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit on Friday ruled that Minnesota may not compel videographers to produce wedding videos for same-sex weddings, as it would infringe on their First Amendment rights to free speech.

In a 2-1 decision penned by Circuit Court Judge David Ryan Stras, the court wrote that wedding videos “are a form of speech that is entitled to First Amendment protection. The Supreme Court long ago recognized that ‘expression by means of motion pictures is included within the free speech and free press guaranty of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.’”

The appellants in the case Telescope Media Group v. Linsey, are Carl Larsen and Angel Larsen, the owners of a Christian videography business specializing in making wedding videos. The Larsens sued the Minnesota Human Rights Commission in 2016 …

Trending: In ‘red flag’ gun bill, House Dems want to flag high-risk individuals; just not police-identified gang members

Continue reading →