FBI’s ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ was initiated on false pretenses

FBI’s ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ was initiated on false pretenses
FBI headquarters (Image: YouTube screen grab)

[Ed. – Andrew McCarthy does us the service of reaching this conclusion as a prosecutor would: reading strictly from the evidence compiled under procedural rules.  Even if there have always been other factors that should and do weigh with us, and lead to the same conclusion, this was a very worthwhile exercise.  This is the analysis that indicts Mueller’s investigation.]

Chicanery was the force behind the formal opening of the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation. There was a false premise, namely: The Trump campaign must have known that Russia possessed emails related to Hillary Clinton. From there, through either intentional deception or incompetence, the foreign ministries of Australia and the United States erected a fraudulent story tying the Trump campaign’s purported knowledge to the publication of hacked Democratic National Committee emails.

That is what we learn from the saga of George Papadopoulos, as fleshed out by the Mueller report.

[…]

Trending: A round-up of analyses of Day 1 of the ‘Take Down Trump’ Project

Papadopoulos Had No Knowledge of Russia’s Intentions

There is no evidence whatsoever, including in the 448-page Mueller report, that Papadopoulos was ever told that Russia intended, through an intermediary, to disseminate damaging information about Clinton in a manner designed to hurt Clinton’s candidacy and help Trump’s. There is, furthermore, no evidence that Papadopoulos ever said such a thing to anyone else — including Downer, whom he famously met at the Kensington Wine Rooms in London on May 6, 2016.

Continue reading →