[Ed. – I know, I know: the easy play here is pointing out Hillary’s manifest unfitness to make such a comment. But it’s also worth pointing out what really matters, which is that no, no one would have been indicted for obstruction, since there’s no case for it — but ONLY Trump would have been “investigated” for it for 22 months, even though there could never have been any case for it.]
Hillary Clinton said Tuesday she believes Donald Trump would have been indicted in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe if he weren’t president, though stopped short of calling for his impeachment.
Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president in 2016, argued during a Q&A session in New York that Mueller’s report “could not be clearer” in making the case Trump tried to obstruct the Russia investigation — even though Mueller did not come to an explicit conclusion on that question.
“I think there’s enough there that any other person who had engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted,” Clinton said at the “Time 100 Summit.” “But because of the rule in the Justice Department that you can’t indict a sitting president, the whole matter of obstruction was very directly sent to the Congress.”