[Ed. – This would be really bad, if true. Trump has nothing to gain by compromising with Feinstein and Harris on his judicial nominations for the 9th Circuit. Assuming it is true — apparently the names in question are, in fact, missing from the nomination list — the WSJ editors are certainly right to oppose it strenuously.]
[M]ore than a few eyes widened this month when the White House omitted three names from the list of 50 judges Mr. Trump sent back up to the Senate. What intrigue gives?
The three missing names were Californians nominated to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals last year. Two other Ninth Circuit nominees, Eric Miller of Washington and Bridget Bade of Arizona, were renominated. But Daniel Collins, Kenneth Lee and Patrick Bumatay were withheld because we’re told the White House is negotiating with California Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris. …
In a November letter to new White House counsel Pat Cipollone, Ms. Feinstein and Ms. Harris requested “that the White House work with us to reach an agreement on a consensus package of nominees.” The Democrats want to pick one name from the White House list, one from their own, and a third consensus nominee.
Trending: Los Angeles starts to defund its police
Why Mr. Cipollone or the President would agree to this or any other deal with these Senators is a mystery.