In defense of Sarah Jeong

In defense of Sarah Jeong
Sarah Jeong (Image via Facebook)

[Ed. – This sounds an awful lot like the “take her seriously, but not literally” explainer-mantra used about Trump. In an odd twist, the left never buys this explanation about Trump’s rhetorical salad-spinning.  Note: when I first saw the Zack Beauchamp tweet referenced in the Andrew Sullivan piece (discussed at the link), I thought it had to be a parody.]

The only reason lefties aren’t offended by this obvious race-based hatred, the argument goes, is that they see the world entirely through the lens of power. Since whites as a class have it, minorities by definition cannot harbor racist attitudes toward them.

“It is simply false to excuse anti-white racism on the grounds that people of color lack power,” French writes. “But this argument confuses the gravity of an offense with the existence of the offense. A powerless person’s hate may not harm the powerful, but it is still hate.”

The problem here, though, is assuming that Jeong’s words were meant literally: that when Jeong wrote “#cancelwhitepeople,” for example, she was literally calling for white genocide. Or when she said “white men are bullsh**,” she meant each and every white man is the human equivalent of bull feces. …

Trending: Biden has one of his most ‘senior’ moments yet

To anyone who’s even passingly familiar with the way the social justice left talks, this is just clearly untrue. “White people” is a shorthand in these communities, one that’s used to capture the way that many whites still act in clueless and/or racist ways. It’s typically used satirically and hyperbolically to emphasize how white people continue to benefit (even unknowingly) from their skin color, or to point out the ways in which a power structure that favors white people continues to exist.

Continue reading →


For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.