Supreme Court rules warrants necessary to track phone locations

Supreme Court rules warrants necessary to track phone locations

[Ed. – That’s big.  Law enforcement can still get other info about your phone calls without a warrant, but this ruling may actually become a wedge in the door on that.  The principle argued by the majority is that cumulative historical info on your whereabouts is intrusive and should have 4A protection.]

In a 5-4 decision on Friday, the justices said police need warrants to gather phone location data as evidence for trials. That reversed and remanded a decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Carpenter v. United States is the first case about phone location data that the Supreme Court has ruled on. That makes it a landmark decision regarding how law enforcement agencies can use technology as they build cases. The court heard arguments in the case on Nov. 29.

The dispute dates back to a 2011 robbery in Detroit, after which police gathered months of phone location data from Timothy Carpenter’s phone provider. They pulled together 12,898 different locations from Carpenter, over 127 days.

Trending: Dem activist drafts a petition to ban Trump rallies

The legal and privacy concern was that police gathered the four months’ worth of Carpenter’s digital footprints without a warrant.

Continue reading →


Commenting Policy

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.